Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

GFX ETERNA 55

G-mount large-format cinema camera with a 102MP GFX sensor, 8K recording, variable ND, 12G-SDI, and pro I/O.

$16,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

vs

Fujifilm

X100V

Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2020

GFX ETERNA 55 is 5.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

GFX ETERNA 55

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

3categories

X100V

Sports & ActionTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX ETERNA 55 wins 3 categories·X100V wins 2 categories
  • BX100V has lower Weight (478 g vs 2000 g)
  • AGFX ETERNA 55 has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 26.1 MP)
  • AGFX ETERNA 55 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AGFX ETERNA 55 has higher Card slots (3 vs 1)
  • BX100V has lower ISO min (native) (160 vs 400)

Key specs at a glance

GFX ETERNA 55X100V
Resolution102 MP26.1 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight2000 g478 g
Battery520 shots350 shots
Burst30 fps

Size and weight, to scale

GFX ETERNA 55

111 × 138 × 177 mm

2000 g (4.41 lb / 70.55 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X100V

128 × 75 × 53 mm

478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)

GFX ETERNA 55 is 17mm narrower than X100V but it is also 63mm taller and 124mm thicker.

GFX ETERNA 55 is 1522 g heavier than X100V.

Depth (front-to-back): 177mm GFX ETERNA 55 · 53mm X100V

Sensor size, to scale

GFX ETERNA 55

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

X100V

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX ETERNA 55X100V
Portrait
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.0Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Travel
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX ETERNA 55

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 110.8, 138.2, 176.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SSD via USB

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 26.1 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • Card slots

    3 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only GFX ETERNA 55 supports it

Reasons to choose

X100V

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3.7 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    478 g vs 2000 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    160 vs 400 — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only X100V supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX ETERNA 55

Pros

  • Large-format 8K cinema capture
  • Electronic variable ND
  • 12G-SDI and GenLock
  • F-Log2 / F-Log2 C

Cons

  • Cinema-only body
  • Very expensive
  • Large and heavy

X100V

Pros

  • Classic design
  • Leaf shutter
  • Film simulations
  • Proven street camera

Cons

  • Superseded by X100VI
  • Fixed lens
  • No IBIS

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GFX ETERNA 55 and X100V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GFX ETERNA 55
X100V
Resolution
102 MP3.9× more
26.1 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II HS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX ETERNA 55
X100V
Aperture
f/2.0
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
GFX ETERNA 55
X100V
Processor
X-Processor 5
X-Processor 4
GFX ETERNA 55
X100V
ISO min (native)
400
160−240 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
51,200
GFX ETERNA 55
X100V
Shutter type
Electronic shutter / shutter angle
Lens Shutter + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, GFX ETERNA 55 or X100V?

GFX ETERNA 55 scores 6.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for X100V — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX ETERNA 55 and X100V?

GFX ETERNA 55 is 102 MP and X100V is 26.1 MP, so the GFX ETERNA 55 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the GFX ETERNA 55 and X100V?

GFX ETERNA 55 does not have IBIS, while X100V does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the GFX ETERNA 55 and X100V?

GFX ETERNA 55 weighs 2000 g and X100V weighs 478 g, so the X100V is 1522 g lighter.

Do the GFX ETERNA 55 and X100V record 4K video?

GFX ETERNA 55: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X100V: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GFX ETERNA 55 and X100V weather sealed?

GFX ETERNA 55: Yes. X100V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the GFX ETERNA 55 and 350 shots for the X100V, giving the GFX ETERNA 55 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX ETERNA 55 launched at $16,499 and X100V at $1,399. The X100V is $15,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GFX ETERNA 55 vs X100V vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.