Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Fujifilm
GFX ETERNA 55
G-mount large-format cinema camera with a 102MP GFX sensor, 8K recording, variable ND, 12G-SDI, and pro I/O.
$16,499
Released Sep 2025
GFX ETERNA 55 is 2.8 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
GFX ETERNA 55
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- BGFX ETERNA 55 has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 24.2 MP)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 400)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has lower Weight (680 g vs 2000 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
GFX ETERNA 55
111 × 138 × 177 mm
2000 g (4.41 lb / 70.55 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 40mm shorter and 88mm thinner than GFX ETERNA 55 but it is also 28mm wider.
EOS R6 Mark II is 1320 g lighter than GFX ETERNA 55.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 177mm GFX ETERNA 55
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
GFX ETERNA 55
111 × 138 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
GFX ETERNA 55
111 × 177 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
GFX ETERNA 55
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
GFX ETERNA 55: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -3.7 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 400 — lower is better
Weight
680 g vs 2000 g — lower is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 425 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
GFX ETERNA 55
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 110.8, 138.2, 176.8
Resolution
102 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SSD via USB
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better
Card slots
3 vs 2 — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
GFX ETERNA 55
Pros
- ✓Large-format 8K cinema capture
- ✓Electronic variable ND
- ✓12G-SDI and GenLock
- ✓F-Log2 / F-Log2 C
Cons
- –Cinema-only body
- –Very expensive
- –Large and heavy
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GFX ETERNA 55?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for GFX ETERNA 55 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX ETERNA 55?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GFX ETERNA 55 is 102 MP, so the GFX ETERNA 55 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX ETERNA 55 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while gFX ETERNA 55 does not have IBIS.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX ETERNA 55?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and GFX ETERNA 55 weighs 2000 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 1320 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX ETERNA 55 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GFX ETERNA 55: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX ETERNA 55 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GFX ETERNA 55: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 520 shots for the GFX ETERNA 55, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GFX ETERNA 55 at $16,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $14,000 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.