Fujifilm
GFX100RF
Fixed-lens 102MP medium format rangefinder-style camera with a 35mm f/4 lens and built-in ND filter.
$4,899
Released Mar 2025
Fujifilm
GFX100S II
Compact 102MP GFX medium format body with X-Processor 5, 8-stop IBIS, and updated subject detection.
$4,999
Released May 2024
GFX100RF is 10 months newer.
Wins
GFX100RF
Wins
GFX100S II
10 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- BGFX100S II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- BGFX100S II has higher RAW buffer depth (96 frames vs 45 frames)
- AGFX100RF has higher Battery life (CIPA) (820 shots vs 530 shots)
- BGFX100S II has higher Burst (electronic) (4.1 fps vs 3 fps)
- AGFX100RF has lower Weight (735 g vs 883 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GFX100RF
134 × 90 × 77 mm
735 g (1.62 lb / 25.93 oz)
GFX100S II
150 × 104 × 87 mm
883 g (1.95 lb / 31.15 oz)
GFX100RF is 17mm narrower, 14mm shorter, and 11mm thinner than GFX100S II.
GFX100RF is 148 g lighter than GFX100S II.
Depth (front-to-back): 77mm GFX100RF · 87mm GFX100S II
Sensor size, to scale
GFX100RF
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
GFX100S II
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GFX100RF
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 133.5, 90.4, 76.5
Battery life (CIPA)
820 shots vs 530 shots — higher is better
Weight
735 g vs 883 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
GFX100S II
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 150, 104.2, 87.2
RAW buffer depth
96 frames vs 45 frames — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only GFX100S II supports it
In-body stabilization
Only GFX100S II supports it
Burst (electronic)
4.1 fps vs 3 fps — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
7 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 102 MP
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 80
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GFX100RF
Pros
- ✓102MP medium format image quality
- ✓Compact fixed-lens GFX design
- ✓Built-in 4-stop ND
- ✓High-resolution EVF
Cons
- –Fixed 35mm f/4 lens
- –No IBIS
- –Premium niche camera
GFX100S II
Pros
- ✓102MP medium format sensor
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓X-Processor 5
- ✓Compact for GFX
Cons
- –Large files
- –Premium price
- –Medium format AF not for sports
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GFX100RF and GFX100S II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GFX100RF
Fujifilm GFX100S II
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, GFX100RF or GFX100S II?
GFX100S II scores 6.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for GFX100RF — 4K recording.
What's the resolution difference between the GFX100RF and GFX100S II?
Both cameras share the same 102 MP resolution.
Do the GFX100RF and GFX100S II have in-body image stabilization?
GFX100RF does not have IBIS, while gFX100S II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100RF or the GFX100S II?
GFX100RF reaches 6 fps mechanical. GFX100S II reaches 7 fps mechanical.
What's the weight difference between the GFX100RF and GFX100S II?
GFX100RF weighs 735 g and GFX100S II weighs 883 g, so the GFX100RF is 148 g lighter.
Do the GFX100RF and GFX100S II record 4K video?
GFX100RF: 4K up to 30p. GFX100S II: 4K up to 30p.
Are the GFX100RF and GFX100S II weather sealed?
GFX100RF: Yes. GFX100S II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 820 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100RF and 530 shots for the GFX100S II, giving the GFX100RF the edge.
How much does each cost?
GFX100RF launched at $4,899 and GFX100S II at $4,999. The GFX100RF is $100 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.