Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

GFX100RF

Fixed-lens 102MP medium format rangefinder-style camera with a 35mm f/4 lens and built-in ND filter.

$4,899

Released Mar 2025

GFX100RF is 2.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

6categories

GFX100RF

Landscape

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·GFX100RF wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 3 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • BGFX100RF has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 45 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIGFX100RF
Resolution24.2 MP102 MP
SensorFull Frame43.8 x 32.9 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps6 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g735 g
Battery760 shots820 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

GFX100RF

134 × 90 × 77 mm

735 g (1.62 lb / 25.93 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 5mm wider, 8mm taller, and 12mm thicker than GFX100RF.

EOS R6 Mark II is 55 g lighter than GFX100RF.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 77mm GFX100RF

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

GFX100RF

134 × 90 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

GFX100RF

134 × 77 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

GFX100RF

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GFX100RF: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIGFX100RF
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 3 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 45 frames — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GFX100RF

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 133.5, 90.4, 76.5

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds SDXC V90, SSD via USB

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

GFX100RF

Pros

  • 102MP medium format image quality
  • Compact fixed-lens GFX design
  • Built-in 4-stop ND
  • High-resolution EVF

Cons

  • Fixed 35mm f/4 lens
  • No IBIS
  • Premium niche camera

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100RF at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100RF
Resolution
24.2 MP
102 MP4.2× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
43.8 x 32.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100RF
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100RF
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps13.3× more
3 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames4× more
45 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100RF
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
720 Mbps2.1× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
F-Log / F-Log2
Codecs
H.265, H.264
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100RF
Weight
680 g−55 g less
735 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
133.5 × 90.4 × 76.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R6 Mark II or GFX100RF?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for GFX100RF — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100RF?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GFX100RF is 102 MP, so the GFX100RF captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100RF have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while gFX100RF does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GFX100RF?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GFX100RF reaches 6 fps mechanical.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100RF?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and GFX100RF weighs 735 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 55 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100RF record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GFX100RF: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100RF weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GFX100RF: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 820 shots for the GFX100RF, giving the GFX100RF the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GFX100RF at $4,899. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.