Fujifilm
GFX100RF
Fixed-lens 102MP medium format rangefinder-style camera with a 35mm f/4 lens and built-in ND filter.
$4,899
Released Mar 2025
Fujifilm
X-H2S
Stacked APS-C speed flagship with 40fps and 6.2K video.
$2,499
Released May 2022
GFX100RF is 2.8 years newer.
Wins
GFX100RF
Wins
X-H2S
6 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BX-H2S has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BX-H2S has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 3 fps)
- BX-H2S has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- AGFX100RF has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 26.16 MP)
- BX-H2S has higher RAW buffer depth (175 frames vs 45 frames)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GFX100RF
134 × 90 × 77 mm
735 g (1.62 lb / 25.93 oz)
X-H2S
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
GFX100RF is 3mm narrower, 3mm shorter, and 8mm thinner than X-H2S.
GFX100RF is 75 g heavier than X-H2S.
Depth (front-to-back): 77mm GFX100RF · 85mm X-H2S
Sensor size, to scale
GFX100RF
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
X-H2S
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
GFX100RF: mount data unavailable
X-H2S
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GFX100RF
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 133.5, 90.4, 76.5
Resolution
102 MP vs 26.16 MP — higher is better
ISO min (native)
80 vs 160 — lower is better
Card types
Adds SSD via USB
Battery life (CIPA)
820 shots vs 580 shots — higher is better
EVF magnification
0.84 × vs 0.8 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-H2S
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 3 fps — higher is better
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
175 frames vs 45 frames — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only X-H2S supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 720 Mbps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GFX100RF
Pros
- ✓102MP medium format image quality
- ✓Compact fixed-lens GFX design
- ✓Built-in 4-stop ND
- ✓High-resolution EVF
Cons
- –Fixed 35mm f/4 lens
- –No IBIS
- –Premium niche camera
X-H2S
Pros
- ✓40fps burst
- ✓Stacked APS-C
- ✓6.2K video
- ✓Great AF
Cons
- –APS-C sensor
- –Complex menus
- –Crop for some modes
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, GFX100RF or X-H2S?
X-H2S scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for GFX100RF — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the GFX100RF and X-H2S?
GFX100RF is 102 MP and X-H2S is 26.16 MP, so the GFX100RF captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GFX100RF and X-H2S have in-body image stabilization?
GFX100RF does not have IBIS, while x-H2S has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100RF or the X-H2S?
GFX100RF reaches 6 fps mechanical. X-H2S reaches 40 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the GFX100RF and X-H2S?
GFX100RF weighs 735 g and X-H2S weighs 660 g, so the X-H2S is 75 g lighter.
Do the GFX100RF and X-H2S record 4K video?
GFX100RF: 4K up to 30p. X-H2S: 4K up to 120p.
Are the GFX100RF and X-H2S weather sealed?
GFX100RF: Yes. X-H2S: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 820 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100RF and 580 shots for the X-H2S, giving the GFX100RF the edge.
How much does each cost?
GFX100RF launched at $4,899 and X-H2S at $2,499. The X-H2S is $2,400 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.