Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

GFX100S II

Compact 102MP GFX medium format body with X-Processor 5, 8-stop IBIS, and updated subject detection.

$4,999

Released May 2024

vs

Fujifilm

XF10

Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.

$499

Released Jul 2018

GFX100S II is 5.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

GFX100S II

LandscapeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

XF10

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX100S II wins 4 categories·XF10 wins 1 categories
  • AGFX100S II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AGFX100S II has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • AGFX100S II has higher RAW buffer depth (96 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AGFX100S II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BXF10 has lower Weight (279 g vs 883 g)

Key specs at a glance

GFX100S IIXF10
Resolution102 MP24.2 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst7 fps6 fps
4K30 fps15 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight883 g279 g
Battery530 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GFX100S II

150 × 104 × 87 mm

883 g (1.95 lb / 31.15 oz)

XF10

113 × 64 × 41 mm

279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)

GFX100S II is 38mm wider, 40mm taller, and 46mm thicker than XF10.

GFX100S II is 604 g heavier than XF10.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm GFX100S II · 41mm XF10

Sensor size, to scale

GFX100S II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

XF10

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX100S IIXF10
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
4.0Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
4.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX100S II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 104.2, 87.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SDXC V90, SSD via USB

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    96 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

XF10

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    279 g vs 883 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    6 fps vs 4.1 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX100S II

Pros

  • 102MP medium format sensor
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • X-Processor 5
  • Compact for GFX

Cons

  • Large files
  • Premium price
  • Medium format AF not for sports

XF10

Pros

  • APS-C in a pocket body
  • 28mm-equivalent lens
  • Very light

Cons

  • No EVF
  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Simpler controls

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GFX100S II and XF10 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GFX100S II
XF10
Resolution
102 MP4.2× more
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II
APS-C Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX100S II
XF10
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Human
GFX100S II
XF10
Burst (mechanical)
7 fps+17%
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
4.1 fps
6 fps+46%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
96 frames9.6× more
10 frames
GFX100S II
XF10
Max resolution
4K
4K
4K max frame rate
30 fps2× more
15 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps14.4× more
50 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.264
GFX100S II
XF10
Weight
883 g
279 g−604 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
150 × 104.2 × 87.2 mm
112.5 × 64.4 × 41 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, GFX100S II or XF10?

GFX100S II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for XF10 — 102MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX100S II and XF10?

GFX100S II is 102 MP and XF10 is 24.2 MP, so the GFX100S II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GFX100S II and XF10 have in-body image stabilization?

GFX100S II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while xF10 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100S II or the XF10?

GFX100S II reaches 7 fps mechanical. XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GFX100S II and XF10?

GFX100S II weighs 883 g and XF10 weighs 279 g, so the XF10 is 604 g lighter.

Do the GFX100S II and XF10 record 4K video?

GFX100S II: 4K up to 30p. XF10: 4K up to 15p.

Are the GFX100S II and XF10 weather sealed?

GFX100S II: Yes. XF10: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 530 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100S II and 330 shots for the XF10, giving the GFX100S II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX100S II launched at $4,999 and XF10 at $499. The XF10 is $4,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.