Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Fujifilm
XF10
Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.
$499
Released Jul 2018
EOS R6 Mark II is 4.3 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
XF10
2 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 10 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 6 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
XF10
113 × 64 × 41 mm
279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 26mm wider, 34mm taller, and 47mm thicker than XF10.
EOS R6 Mark II is 401 g heavier than XF10.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 41mm XF10
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
XF10
113 × 64 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
XF10
113 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
XF10
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
XF10: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
XF10
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
279 g vs 680 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 24.2 MP
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
XF10
Pros
- ✓APS-C in a pocket body
- ✓28mm-equivalent lens
- ✓Very light
Cons
- –No EVF
- –4K limited to 15p
- –Simpler controls
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and XF10 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm XF10
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or XF10?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for XF10 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and XF10?
Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and XF10 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while xF10 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the XF10?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and XF10?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and XF10 weighs 279 g, so the XF10 is 401 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and XF10 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. XF10: 4K up to 15p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and XF10 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. XF10: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 330 shots for the XF10, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and XF10 at $499. The XF10 is $2,000 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.