Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-H2

40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.

$1,999

Released Sep 2022

vs

Fujifilm

XF10

Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.

$499

Released Jul 2018

X-H2 is 4.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

X-H2

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

XF10

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2 wins 5 categories·XF10 wins 0 categories
  • AX-H2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • AX-H2 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AX-H2 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2XF10
Resolution40.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst20 fps6 fps
4K60 fps15 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight660 g279 g
Battery540 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

XF10

113 × 64 × 41 mm

279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)

X-H2 is 24mm wider, 29mm taller, and 44mm thicker than XF10.

X-H2 is 381 g heavier than XF10.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2 · 41mm XF10

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

XF10

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

XF10: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2XF10
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90

  • RAW buffer depth

    202 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

XF10

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    279 g vs 660 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2

Pros

  • 40MP APS-C
  • 8K video
  • IBIS

Cons

  • APS-C
  • Large files
  • Complex video modes

XF10

Pros

  • APS-C in a pocket body
  • 28mm-equivalent lens
  • Very light

Cons

  • No EVF
  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Simpler controls

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-H2 and XF10 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2
XF10
Resolution
40.2 MP+66%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
APS-C Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2
XF10
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Human
X-H2
XF10
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps2.5× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps3.3× more
6 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
202 frames20.2× more
10 frames
X-H2
XF10
Max resolution
8K
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps4× more
15 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps14.4× more
50 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.264
X-H2
XF10
Weight
660 g
279 g−381 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm
112.5 × 64.4 × 41 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-H2 or XF10?

X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for XF10 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2 and XF10?

X-H2 is 40.2 MP and XF10 is 24.2 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2 and XF10 have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while xF10 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2 or the XF10?

X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic. XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2 and XF10?

X-H2 weighs 660 g and XF10 weighs 279 g, so the XF10 is 381 g lighter.

Do the X-H2 and XF10 record 4K video?

X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. XF10: 4K up to 15p.

Are the X-H2 and XF10 weather sealed?

X-H2: Yes. XF10: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2 and 330 shots for the XF10, giving the X-H2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2 launched at $1,999 and XF10 at $499. The XF10 is $1,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.