Fujifilm
X-A1
First X-A entry body with a 16MP APS-C Bayer sensor and compact X-mount design.
$599
Released Sep 2013
Fujifilm
X-H2
40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.
$1,999
Released Sep 2022
X-H2 is 9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
X-A1
Wins
X-H2
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BX-H2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 10 frames)
- BX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
- BX-H2 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 5.6 fps)
- BX-H2 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 5.6 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X-A1
117 × 67 × 39 mm
330 g (0.73 lb / 11.64 oz)
X-H2
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
X-A1 is 19mm narrower, 26mm shorter, and 46mm thinner than X-H2.
X-A1 is 330 g lighter than X-H2.
Depth (front-to-back): 39mm X-A1 · 85mm X-H2
Sensor size, to scale
X-A1
23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
368 mm² area
X-H2
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
X-A1
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
X-H2
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X-A1
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 116.9, 66.5, 39
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
330 g vs 660 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
X-H2
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90
RAW buffer depth
202 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…
Burst (electronic)
20 fps vs 5.6 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X-A1
Pros
- ✓Very affordable
- ✓Compact
- ✓X-mount lenses
Cons
- –No EVF
- –Very old AF
- –No 4K
X-H2
Pros
- ✓40MP APS-C
- ✓8K video
- ✓IBIS
Cons
- –APS-C
- –Large files
- –Complex video modes
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the X-A1 and X-H2 at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm X-A1
Fujifilm X-H2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, X-A1 or X-H2?
X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for X-A1 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the X-A1 and X-H2?
X-A1 is 16.3 MP and X-H2 is 40.2 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X-A1 and X-H2 have in-body image stabilization?
X-A1 does not have IBIS, while x-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X-A1 or the X-H2?
X-A1 reaches 5.6 fps electronic. X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X-A1 and X-H2?
X-A1 weighs 330 g and X-H2 weighs 660 g, so the X-A1 is 330 g lighter.
Do the X-A1 and X-H2 record 4K video?
X-A1: Full HD. X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the X-A1 and X-H2 weather sealed?
X-A1: No. X-H2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the X-A1 and 540 shots for the X-H2, giving the X-H2 the edge.
How much does each cost?
X-A1 launched at $599 and X-H2 at $1,999. The X-A1 is $1,400 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.