Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X-E3

Minimal rangefinder-style X body with 24MP X-Trans III and 4K video.

$899

Launch price

Released Sep 2017

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

Alpha 1 II is 7.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

X-E3

Wins

16categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X-E3 wins 0 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 23 frames)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)

Key specs at a glance

X-E3Alpha 1 II
Resolution24.3 MP50.1 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max12,80032,000
Burst14 fps30 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight337 g743 g
Battery350 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-E3

121 × 74 × 43 mm

337 g (0.74 lb / 11.89 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

X-E3 is 15mm narrower, 23mm shorter, and 40mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

X-E3 is 406 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 43mm X-E3 · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Sensor size, to scale

X-E3

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-E3

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-E3Alpha 1 II
Portrait
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
3.5Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
1.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-E3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121.3, 73.9, 42.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    337 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -4 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 23 frames — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Insect…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth
  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-E3

Pros

  • Compact rangefinder style
  • 24MP X-Trans III
  • 4K video

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Fixed rear screen
  • Older AF

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-E3 and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-E3
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
24.3 MP
50.1 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS III
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
23.6 x 15.6 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
X-E3
Alpha 1 II
Processor
X-Processor Pro
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
X-E3
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
32,000+1.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
X-E3
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-E3 or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for X-E3 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X-E3 and Alpha 1 II?

X-E3 is 24.3 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-E3 and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

X-E3 does not have IBIS, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-E3 or the Alpha 1 II?

X-E3 reaches 14 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-E3 and Alpha 1 II?

X-E3 weighs 337 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the X-E3 is 406 g lighter.

Do the X-E3 and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

X-E3: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the X-E3 and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

X-E3: No. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the X-E3 and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-E3 launched at $899 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The X-E3 is $5,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X-E3 vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Sony press materials.