Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-H2

40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.

$1,999

Released Sep 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-M5

Tiny creator-focused X-mount camera with a 26MP X-Trans sensor, X-Processor 5, 6.2K video, and vlog controls.

$799

Released Oct 2024

X-M5 is 2.1 years newer.

Wins

8categories

X-H2

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

X-M5

WildlifeSports & Action

4 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2 wins 5 categories·X-M5 wins 0 categories
  • AX-H2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 78 frames)
  • AX-H2 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AX-H2 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 8 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2X-M5
Resolution40.2 MP26.1 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight660 g355 g
Battery540 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

X-M5

112 × 67 × 38 mm

355 g (0.78 lb / 12.52 oz)

X-H2 is 24mm wider, 26mm taller, and 47mm thicker than X-M5.

X-H2 is 305 g heavier than X-M5.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2 · 38mm X-M5

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

X-M5

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-M5

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2X-M5
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    202 frames vs 78 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT

  • In-body stabilization

    Only X-H2 supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only X-H2 supports it

Reasons to choose

X-M5

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.9, 66.6, 38

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    355 g vs 660 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2

Pros

  • 40MP APS-C
  • 8K video
  • IBIS

Cons

  • APS-C
  • Large files
  • Complex video modes

X-M5

Pros

  • Very small X-mount body
  • 6.2K open-gate video
  • Creator microphone modes
  • Affordable entry into Fujifilm X

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • No IBIS
  • Single card slot

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-H2 and X-M5 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2
X-M5
Resolution
40.2 MP+54%
26.1 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2
X-M5
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
X-H2
X-M5
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps+88%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
30 fps+50%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
202 frames2.6× more
78 frames
X-H2
X-M5
Max resolution
8K
6.2K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps3.6× more
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
F-Log / F-Log2
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
X-H2
X-M5
Weight
660 g
355 g−305 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm
111.9 × 66.6 × 38 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, X-H2 or X-M5?

X-H2 scores 6.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for X-M5 — 40.2MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2 and X-M5?

X-H2 is 40.2 MP and X-M5 is 26.1 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2 and X-M5 have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-M5 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2 or the X-M5?

X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic. X-M5 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2 and X-M5?

X-H2 weighs 660 g and X-M5 weighs 355 g, so the X-M5 is 305 g lighter.

Do the X-H2 and X-M5 record 4K video?

X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-M5: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-H2 and X-M5 weather sealed?

X-H2: Yes. X-M5: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2 and 330 shots for the X-M5, giving the X-H2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2 launched at $1,999 and X-M5 at $799. The X-M5 is $1,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.