Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-H2S

Stacked APS-C speed flagship with 40fps and 6.2K video.

$2,499

Released May 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Released Jan 2026

GR IV is 3.6 years newer.

Wins

7categories

X-H2S

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

3categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2S wins 3 categories·GR IV wins 2 categories
  • BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
  • AX-H2S has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AX-H2S has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • AX-H2S has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV has lower Weight (262 g vs 660 g)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2SGR IV
Resolution26.16 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,800204,800
Burst40 fps4 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopYes
Weight660 g262 g
Battery580 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2S

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

X-H2S is 27mm wider, 32mm taller, and 52mm thicker than GR IV.

X-H2S is 398 g heavier than GR IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2S · 33mm GR IV

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2S

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2S

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2SGR IV
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2S

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    580 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 660 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 160 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2S

Pros

  • 40fps burst
  • Stacked APS-C
  • 6.2K video
  • Great AF

Cons

  • APS-C sensor
  • Complex menus
  • Crop for some modes

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2S
GR IV
Resolution
26.16 MP+2%
25.74 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2S
GR IV
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
4258.7× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Face, Eye
X-H2S
GR IV
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps3.8× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps10× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
175 frames
X-H2S
GR IV
Max resolution
6.2K
Full HD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
Standard profiles
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
X-H2S
GR IV
Weight
660 g
262 g−398 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-H2S or GR IV?

X-H2S scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IV — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2S and GR IV?

X-H2S is 26.16 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the X-H2S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2S and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2S has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2S or the GR IV?

X-H2S reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2S and GR IV?

X-H2S weighs 660 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 398 g lighter.

Do the X-H2S and GR IV record 4K video?

X-H2S: 4K up to 120p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-H2S and GR IV weather sealed?

X-H2S: Yes. GR IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2S and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the X-H2S the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2S launched at $2,499 and GR IV at $1,499. The GR IV is $1,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.