Fujifilm
X-H2S
Stacked APS-C speed flagship with 40fps and 6.2K video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Sigma
FP2
Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2026
FP2 is 4.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
X-H2S
Wins
FP2
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AX-H2S has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 0 fps)
- AX-H2S has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFP2 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AX-H2S has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
- AX-H2S has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareX-H2S
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FP2
112 × 71 × 41 mm
460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)
X-H2S is 24mm wider, 22mm taller, and 44mm thicker than FP2.
X-H2S is 200 g heavier than FP2.
Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2S · 41mm FP2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
X-H2S
136 × 93 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FP2
112 × 71 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
X-H2S
136 × 85 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FP2
112 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
X-H2S
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
FP2
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
X-H2S
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
FP2: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X-H2S
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
FP2
Subject recognition
Adds Animals, Birds, People
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112, 71, 41
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ
ISO min (native)
100 vs 160 — lower is better
Weight
460 g vs 660 g — lower is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 175 frames — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X-H2S
Pros
- ✓40fps burst
- ✓Stacked APS-C
- ✓6.2K video
- ✓Great AF
Cons
- –APS-C sensor
- –Complex menus
- –Crop for some modes
FP2
Pros
- ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
- ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
- ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
- ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
- ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21
Cons
- –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
- –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
- –Electronic shutter only
- –No headphone jack (USB audio only)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the X-H2S and FP2 at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm X-H2S
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, X-H2S or FP2?
X-H2S scores 9.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for FP2 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the X-H2S and FP2?
X-H2S is 26.16 MP and FP2 is 24.5 MP, so the X-H2S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X-H2S and FP2 have in-body image stabilization?
X-H2S has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while FP2 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2S or the FP2?
X-H2S reaches 40 fps electronic. FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X-H2S and FP2?
X-H2S weighs 660 g and FP2 weighs 460 g, so the FP2 is 200 g lighter.
Do the X-H2S and FP2 record 4K video?
X-H2S: 4K up to 120p. FP2: 4K up to 59.94p.
Are the X-H2S and FP2 weather sealed?
X-H2S: Yes. FP2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2S and 370 shots for the FP2, giving the X-H2S the edge.
How much does each cost?
X-H2S launched at $2,499 and FP2 at $2,199. The FP2 is $300 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way X-H2S vs FP2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Sigma press materials.