Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-T200

Lightweight entry X-mount body with big touchscreen and approachable controls.

$699

Released Jan 2020

vs
Alpha 7 IV

Sony

Alpha 7 IV

33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.

$2,499

Released Oct 2021

Alpha 7 IV is 1.8 years newer.

Wins

2categories

X-T200

Wins

15categories

Alpha 7 IV

PortraitWildlife

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X-T200 wins 0 categories·Alpha 7 IV wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher IBIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 16 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Battery life (CIPA) (580 shots vs 270 shots)

Key specs at a glance

X-T200Alpha 7 IV
Resolution24.2 MP33 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max12,80051,200
Burst8 fps10 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNo5.5-stop
Weight370 g658 g
Battery270 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-T200

121 × 84 × 55 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

Alpha 7 IV front view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 × 80 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

X-T200 is 10mm narrower, 13mm shorter, and 25mm thinner than Alpha 7 IV.

X-T200 is 288 g lighter than Alpha 7 IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 55mm X-T200 · 80mm Alpha 7 IV

Sensor size, to scale

X-T200

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Alpha 7 IV

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-T200

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7 IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-T200Alpha 7 IV
Portrait
5.5Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
2.0Limited
6.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
1.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-T200

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121, 83.7, 55.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    370 g vs 658 g — lower is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 IV

  • AF low-light limit

    -4 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    828 frames vs 16 frames — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Insect…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 12,800 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth
  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-T200

Pros

  • Affordable X-mount
  • Large touchscreen
  • Lightweight

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • Plastic build
  • Limited pro features

Alpha 7 IV

Pros

  • 33MP — more detail for cropping and print
  • 10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
  • Full-size HDMI port
  • 759 phase-detect AF points

Cons

  • 4K 60p requires Super35 crop
  • 10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
  • Complex menu system

Full specifications

= category winner

X-T200
Alpha 7 IV
Resolution
24.2 MP
33 MP+36%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
X-T200
Alpha 7 IV
AF system
Hybrid AF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
425
759+79%
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-2 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
X-T200
Alpha 7 IV
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
10 fps+25%
Burst (electronic)
8 fps
10 fps+25%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
16 frames
828 frames51.8× more
X-T200
Alpha 7 IV
Max resolution
4K
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
30 fps
60 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
600 Mbps3× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
None
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
X-T200
Alpha 7 IV
Weight
370 g−288 g less
658 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
121 × 83.7 × 55.1 mm
131.3 × 96.4 × 79.8 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-T200 or Alpha 7 IV?

Alpha 7 IV scores 8.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for X-T200 — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the X-T200 and Alpha 7 IV?

X-T200 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-T200 and Alpha 7 IV have in-body image stabilization?

X-T200 does not have IBIS, while alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-T200 or the Alpha 7 IV?

X-T200 reaches 8 fps electronic. Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-T200 and Alpha 7 IV?

X-T200 weighs 370 g and Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g, so the X-T200 is 288 g lighter.

Do the X-T200 and Alpha 7 IV record 4K video?

X-T200: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-T200 and Alpha 7 IV weather sealed?

X-T200: No. Alpha 7 IV: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 270 shots (CIPA) for the X-T200 and 580 shots for the Alpha 7 IV, giving the Alpha 7 IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-T200 launched at $699 and Alpha 7 IV at $2,499. The X-T200 is $1,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Sony press materials.