
Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-T200
Lightweight entry X-mount body with big touchscreen and approachable controls.
$699
Released Jan 2020
EOS R6 Mark II is 2.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-T200
3 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 16 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 8 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 270 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
X-T200
121 × 84 × 55 mm
370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 17mm wider, 15mm taller, and 33mm thicker than X-T200.
EOS R6 Mark II is 310 g heavier than X-T200.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 55mm X-T200
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
X-T200
121 × 84 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
X-T200
121 × 55 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-T200
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-T200
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 16 frames — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-T200
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 121, 83.7, 55.1
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
370 g vs 680 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 24.2 MP
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-T200
Pros
- ✓Affordable X-mount
- ✓Large touchscreen
- ✓Lightweight
Cons
- –Older sensor
- –Plastic build
- –Limited pro features
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-T200
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T200?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for X-T200 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200?
Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T200 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T200?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T200 reaches 8 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-T200 weighs 370 g, so the X-T200 is 310 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T200: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T200: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 270 shots for the X-T200, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T200 at $699. The X-T200 is $1,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.