Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-T200

Lightweight entry X-mount body with big touchscreen and approachable controls.

$699

Released Jan 2020

EOS R6 Mark II is 2.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

14categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

1categories

X-T200

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·X-T200 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 16 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 8 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 270 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX-T200
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps8 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g370 g
Battery760 shots270 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

X-T200

121 × 84 × 55 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 17mm wider, 15mm taller, and 33mm thicker than X-T200.

EOS R6 Mark II is 310 g heavier than X-T200.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 55mm X-T200

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

X-T200

121 × 84 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

X-T200

121 × 55 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X-T200

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-T200

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX-T200
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 16 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T200

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121, 83.7, 55.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    370 g vs 680 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X-T200

Pros

  • Affordable X-mount
  • Large touchscreen
  • Lightweight

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • Plastic build
  • Limited pro features

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X-T200
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T200
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T200
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps5× more
8 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames11.3× more
16 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T200
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps+70%
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T200
Weight
680 g
370 g−310 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
121 × 83.7 × 55.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T200?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for X-T200 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T200?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T200 reaches 8 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-T200 weighs 370 g, so the X-T200 is 310 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T200 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 270 shots for the X-T200, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T200 at $699. The X-T200 is $1,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.