Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

GFX100 II

102MP medium format flagship for studio, fashion, and landscape.

$7,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2023

vs

Fujifilm

X-T200

Lightweight entry X-mount body with big touchscreen and approachable controls.

$699

Launch price

Released Jan 2020

GFX100 II is 3.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

GFX100 II

Video & HybridLandscape

Wins

2categories

X-T200

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX100 II wins 5 categories·X-T200 wins 0 categories
  • AGFX100 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AGFX100 II has higher RAW buffer depth (325 frames vs 16 frames)
  • AGFX100 II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AGFX100 II has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AGFX100 II has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

GFX100 IIX-T200
Resolution102 MP24.2 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst8 fps8 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight1030 g370 g
Battery540 shots270 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GFX100 II

152 × 117 × 99 mm

1030 g (2.27 lb / 36.33 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X-T200

121 × 84 × 55 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

GFX100 II is 31mm wider, 34mm taller, and 43mm thicker than X-T200.

GFX100 II is 660 g heavier than X-T200.

Depth (front-to-back): 99mm GFX100 II · 55mm X-T200

Sensor size, to scale

GFX100 II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

X-T200

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GFX100 II: mount data unavailable

X-T200

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX100 IIX-T200
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX100 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -5.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 152.4, 117.4, 98.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SSD via USB

  • RAW buffer depth

    325 frames vs 16 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T200

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121, 83.7, 55.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    370 g vs 1030 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    8 fps vs 5.3 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 8 fps
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX100 II

Pros

  • 102MP medium format
  • Stunning detail
  • Pro video

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files
  • Slow operation feel

X-T200

Pros

  • Affordable X-mount
  • Large touchscreen
  • Lightweight

Cons

  • Older sensor
  • Plastic build
  • Limited pro features

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GFX100 II and X-T200 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GFX100 II
X-T200
Resolution
102 MP4.2× more
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II HS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX100 II
X-T200
Processor
X-Processor 5
Fujifilm image processor
GFX100 II
X-T200
ISO min (native)
80−120 less
200
ISO max (native)
12,800
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
GFX100 II
X-T200
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Focal Plane Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, GFX100 II or X-T200?

GFX100 II scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for X-T200 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX100 II and X-T200?

GFX100 II is 102 MP and X-T200 is 24.2 MP, so the GFX100 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GFX100 II and X-T200 have in-body image stabilization?

GFX100 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-T200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100 II or the X-T200?

GFX100 II reaches 8 fps mechanical. X-T200 reaches 8 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GFX100 II and X-T200?

GFX100 II weighs 1030 g and X-T200 weighs 370 g, so the X-T200 is 660 g lighter.

Do the GFX100 II and X-T200 record 4K video?

GFX100 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-T200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GFX100 II and X-T200 weather sealed?

GFX100 II: Yes. X-T200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100 II and 270 shots for the X-T200, giving the GFX100 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX100 II launched at $7,499 and X-T200 at $699. The X-T200 is $6,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GFX100 II vs X-T200 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.