Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
Start comparing

Fujifilm

GFX100 II

102MP medium format flagship for studio, fashion, and landscape.

$7,499

Released Sep 2023

Full specs →
vs

Fujifilm

X-T200

Lightweight entry X-mount body with big touchscreen and approachable controls.

$699

Released Jan 2020

Full specs →

GFX100 II is 3.7 years newer.

Wins

11categories

GFX100 II

★ Video & Hybrid★ Landscape

Wins

2categories

X-T200

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX100 II wins 5 categories·X-T200 wins 0 categories
  • AGFX100 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AGFX100 II has higher RAW buffer depth (325 frames vs 16 frames)
  • AGFX100 II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AGFX100 II has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AGFX100 II has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

GFX100 IIX-T200
Resolution102 MP24.2 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst8 fps8 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight1030 g370 g
Battery540 shots270 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GFX100 II

152 × 117 × 99 mm

1030 g (2.27 lb / 36.33 oz)

X-T200

121 × 84 × 55 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

GFX100 II is 31mm wider, 34mm taller, and 43mm thicker than X-T200.

GFX100 II is 660 g heavier than X-T200.

Depth (front-to-back): 99mm GFX100 II · 55mm X-T200

Sensor size, to scale

GFX100 II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

X-T200

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GFX100 II: mount data unavailable

X-T200

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX100 IIX-T200
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX100 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -5.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 152.4, 117.4, 98.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SSD via USB

  • RAW buffer depth

    325 frames vs 16 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T200

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121, 83.7, 55.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    370 g vs 1030 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    8 fps vs 5.3 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
  • ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
  • ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
  • ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
  • ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 8 fps
  • ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX100 II

Pros

  • ✓102MP medium format
  • ✓Stunning detail
  • ✓Pro video

Cons

  • –Very expensive
  • –Large files
  • –Slow operation feel

X-T200

Pros

  • ✓Affordable X-mount
  • ✓Large touchscreen
  • ✓Lightweight

Cons

  • –Older sensor
  • –Plastic build
  • –Limited pro features

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

GFX100 II
X-T200
Resolution
102 MP✓4.2× more
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II HS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX100 II
X-T200
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Hybrid AF
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-5.5 EV✓
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Human
GFX100 II
X-T200
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
5.3 fps
8 fps✓+51%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
325 frames✓20.3× more
16 frames
GFX100 II
X-T200
Max resolution
8K
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps✓2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps✓3.6× more
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.264
GFX100 II
X-T200
Weight
1030 g
370 g✓−660 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
152.4 × 117.4 × 98.6 mm
121 × 83.7 × 55.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, GFX100 II or X-T200?

GFX100 II scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for X-T200 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX100 II and X-T200?

GFX100 II is 102 MP and X-T200 is 24.2 MP, so the GFX100 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GFX100 II and X-T200 have in-body image stabilization?

GFX100 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100 II or the X-T200?

GFX100 II reaches 8 fps mechanical. X-T200 reaches 8 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GFX100 II and X-T200?

GFX100 II weighs 1030 g and X-T200 weighs 370 g, so the X-T200 is 660 g lighter.

Do the GFX100 II and X-T200 record 4K video?

GFX100 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-T200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GFX100 II and X-T200 weather sealed?

GFX100 II: Yes. X-T200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100 II and 270 shots for the X-T200, giving the GFX100 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX100 II launched at $7,499 and X-T200 at $699. The X-T200 is $6,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.