Fujifilm
X-H2
40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.
$1,999
Released Sep 2022
Fujifilm
X-T200
Lightweight entry X-mount body with big touchscreen and approachable controls.
$699
Released Jan 2020
X-H2 is 2.7 years newer.
Wins
X-H2
Wins
X-T200
4 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- AX-H2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- AX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 16 frames)
- AX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- AX-H2 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 8 fps)
- AX-H2 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X-H2
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
X-T200
121 × 84 × 55 mm
370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)
X-H2 is 15mm wider, 9mm taller, and 29mm thicker than X-T200.
X-H2 is 290 g heavier than X-T200.
Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2 · 55mm X-T200
Sensor size, to scale
X-H2
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
X-T200
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
X-H2
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
X-T200
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X-H2
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90
RAW buffer depth
202 frames vs 16 frames — higher is better
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-T200
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 121, 83.7, 55.1
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
370 g vs 660 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X-H2
Pros
- ✓40MP APS-C
- ✓8K video
- ✓IBIS
Cons
- –APS-C
- –Large files
- –Complex video modes
X-T200
Pros
- ✓Affordable X-mount
- ✓Large touchscreen
- ✓Lightweight
Cons
- –Older sensor
- –Plastic build
- –Limited pro features
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the X-H2 and X-T200 at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm X-H2
Fujifilm X-T200
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, X-H2 or X-T200?
X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for X-T200 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the X-H2 and X-T200?
X-H2 is 40.2 MP and X-T200 is 24.2 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X-H2 and X-T200 have in-body image stabilization?
X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T200 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2 or the X-T200?
X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic. X-T200 reaches 8 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X-H2 and X-T200?
X-H2 weighs 660 g and X-T200 weighs 370 g, so the X-T200 is 290 g lighter.
Do the X-H2 and X-T200 record 4K video?
X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-T200: 4K up to 30p.
Are the X-H2 and X-T200 weather sealed?
X-H2: Yes. X-T200: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2 and 270 shots for the X-T200, giving the X-H2 the edge.
How much does each cost?
X-H2 launched at $1,999 and X-T200 at $699. The X-T200 is $1,300 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.