Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-T30 III

Compact X-T series body with flagship AF in a small package.

$899

Released Aug 2025

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 9 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

X-T30 III

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

11categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X-T30 III wins 0 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 26.1 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-T30 IIIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution26.1 MP66.8 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max12,80032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight378 g713 g
Battery315 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-T30 III

118 × 83 × 47 mm

378 g (0.83 lb / 13.33 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

X-T30 III is 14mm narrower, 14mm shorter, and 36mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI.

X-T30 III is 335 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 47mm X-T30 III · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X-T30 III

118 × 83 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X-T30 III

118 × 47 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X-T30 III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-T30 III

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-T30 IIIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-T30 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 118.4, 82.8, 46.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane…

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only X-T30 III supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only X-T30 III supports it

  • Weight

    378 g vs 713 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Eye, Insect…

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 26.1 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-T30 III

Pros

  • Small body
  • Modern AF
  • Affordable

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Smaller grip
  • Enthusiast not pro build

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-T30 III and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-T30 III
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
26.1 MP
66.8 MP2.6× more
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-T30 III
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
425
759+79%
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
X-T30 III
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
RAW buffer depth
78 frames
150 frames+92%
X-T30 III
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
6.2K
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
600 Mbps3× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
X-T30 III
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
378 g−335 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
118.4 × 82.8 × 46.8 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, X-T30 III or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for X-T30 III — 66.8MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the X-T30 III and Alpha 7R VI?

X-T30 III is 26.1 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-T30 III and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

X-T30 III does not have IBIS, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-T30 III or the Alpha 7R VI?

X-T30 III reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-T30 III and Alpha 7R VI?

X-T30 III weighs 378 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the X-T30 III is 335 g lighter.

Do the X-T30 III and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

X-T30 III: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the X-T30 III and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

X-T30 III: No. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 315 shots (CIPA) for the X-T30 III and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-T30 III launched at $899 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The X-T30 III is $3,600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Sony press materials.