Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-T30 III
Compact X-T series body with flagship AF in a small package.
$899
Launch priceReleased Aug 2025
X-T30 III is 2.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-T30 III
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 23 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 315 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-T30 III
118 × 83 × 47 mm
378 g (0.83 lb / 13.33 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 20mm wider, 16mm taller, and 42mm thicker than X-T30 III.
EOS R6 Mark II is 292 g heavier than X-T30 III.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 47mm X-T30 III
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T30 III
118 × 83 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T30 III
118 × 47 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-T30 III
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-T30 III: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 23 frames — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Dogs, Cats, Horses…
AF points / zones
1053 vs 425 — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 315 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-T30 III
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 118.4, 82.8, 46.8
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Subject recognition
Adds Animals, Eyes, Vehicles
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Weight
378 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Burst (mechanical)
20 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC
Resolution
26.1 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-T30 III
Pros
- ✓Small body
- ✓Modern AF
- ✓Affordable
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Smaller grip
- –Enthusiast not pro build
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T30 III at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-T30 III
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T30 III?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for X-T30 III — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T30 III?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-T30 III is 26.1 MP, so the X-T30 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T30 III have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-T30 III does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T30 III?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T30 III reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T30 III?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X-T30 III weighs 378 g, so the X-T30 III is 292 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T30 III record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T30 III: 4K up to 59.94p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T30 III weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T30 III: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 315 shots for the X-T30 III, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T30 III at $899. The X-T30 III is $1,600 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X-T30 III vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.