Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X100F

Fourth-generation X100 with 24MP X-Trans III, hybrid viewfinder, and fixed 35mm-equivalent lens.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jan 2017

vs
GR IVx

Ricoh

GR IVx

40mm-equivalent GR IV sibling with a newly designed 26.1mm f/2.8 lens, 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 5-axis SR, 4K video, 53GB internal storage, and pocket street-camera handling. Winter 2026 planned.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Dec 2026

GR IVx is 9.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

X100F

Wins

5categories

GR IVx

Portrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X100F wins 2 categories·GR IVx wins 3 categories
  • BGR IVx has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
  • AX100F has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • BGR IVx has higher Max video bit rate (150 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
  • BGR IVx has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • AX100F has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X100FGR IVx
Resolution24.3 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,800204,800
Burst8 fps4 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight469 g265 g
Battery390 shots250 shots
4K30 fps

Size and weight, to scale

X100F

127 × 75 × 52 mm

469 g (1.03 lb / 16.54 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IVx front view

GR IVx

109 × 61 × 33 mm

265 g (0.58 lb / 9.35 oz)

X100F is 17mm wider, 14mm taller, and 19mm thicker than GR IVx.

X100F is 204 g heavier than GR IVx.

Depth (front-to-back): 52mm X100F · 33mm GR IVx

Sensor size, to scale

X100F

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

GR IVx

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX100FGR IVx
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
1.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
0.0Limited
1.0Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X100F

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.5, 74.8, 52.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only X100F supports it

Reasons to choose

GR IVx

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 33.4

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    150 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 200 — lower is better

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only GR IVx supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X100F

Pros

  • Hybrid viewfinder
  • 24MP X-Trans III
  • Leaf shutter
  • Compact street camera

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No IBIS
  • No 4K

GR IVx

Pros

  • New 26.1mm f/2.8 GR lens (40mm equiv.)
  • GR IV 25.74MP APS-C + 5-axis SR
  • 4K 30p/24p and 53GB built-in storage
  • Snap focus, 50/71mm crops, 2-stop ND
  • Pocketable 265g body

Cons

  • Price not yet announced (listed at GR IV $1,499)
  • Winter 2026 or later — still in development as of Aug 2026
  • No built-in EVF
  • Fixed 40mm-equiv. lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X100F and GR IVx at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X100F
GR IVx
Resolution
24.3 MP
25.74 MP+6%
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS III
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.6 x 15.6 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
X100F
GR IVx
Aperture
f/2.0
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
40 mm
X100F
GR IVx
Processor
X-Processor Pro
GR ENGINE 7
X100F
GR IVx
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
204,800+4 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
204,800
X100F
GR IVx
Shutter type
Leaf Shutter + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, X100F or GR IVx?

GR IVx scores 5.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for X100F — 265g — easy to handhold for selfie video.

What's the resolution difference between the X100F and GR IVx?

X100F is 24.3 MP and GR IVx is 25.74 MP, so the GR IVx captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X100F and GR IVx have in-body image stabilization?

X100F does not have IBIS, while GR IVx has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X100F or the GR IVx?

X100F reaches 8 fps electronic. GR IVx reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X100F and GR IVx?

X100F weighs 469 g and GR IVx weighs 265 g, so the GR IVx is 204 g lighter.

Do the X100F and GR IVx record 4K video?

X100F: Full HD. GR IVx: 4K up to 30p.

Are the X100F and GR IVx weather sealed?

X100F: No. GR IVx: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the X100F and 250 shots for the GR IVx, giving the X100F the edge.

How much does each cost?

X100F launched at $1,299 and GR IVx at $1,499. The X100F is $200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X100F vs GR IVx vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Ricoh press materials.