Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X100F
Fourth-generation X100 with 24MP X-Trans III, hybrid viewfinder, and fixed 35mm-equivalent lens.
$1,299
Released Jan 2017
EOS R6 Mark II is 5.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X100F
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 25 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 8 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
X100F
127 × 75 × 52 mm
469 g (1.03 lb / 16.54 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 24mm taller, and 36mm thicker than X100F.
EOS R6 Mark II is 211 g heavier than X100F.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 52mm X100F
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
X100F
127 × 75 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
X100F
127 × 52 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X100F
23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
368 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X100F: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 25 frames — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X100F
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 126.5, 74.8, 52.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
469 g vs 680 g — lower is better
Resolution
24.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X100F
Pros
- ✓Hybrid viewfinder
- ✓24MP X-Trans III
- ✓Leaf shutter
- ✓Compact street camera
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No IBIS
- –No 4K
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X100F at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X100F
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X100F?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for X100F — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100F?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X100F is 24.3 MP, so the X100F captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100F have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x100F does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X100F?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X100F reaches 8 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100F?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X100F weighs 469 g, so the X100F is 211 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100F record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X100F: Full HD.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X100F weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X100F: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 390 shots for the X100F, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X100F at $1,299. The X100F is $1,200 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.