Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X100V

Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2020

vs

Pentax

K-3 II

24MP APS-C DSLR with pixel shift resolution, GPS, and no AA filter for detail-focused work.

$1,099

Launch price

Released Apr 2015

X100V is 4.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

X100V

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

8categories

K-3 II

WildlifeTravel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X100V wins 2 categories·K-3 II wins 3 categories
  • BK-3 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AX100V has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 101)
  • BK-3 II has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 17 frames)
  • BK-3 II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 12,800)
  • AX100V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X100VK-3 II
Resolution26.1 MP24.4 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80025,600
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNo6-stop
Weight478 g700 g
Battery350 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X100V

128 × 75 × 53 mm

478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-3 II

132 × 102 × 78 mm

700 g (1.54 lb / 24.69 oz)

X100V is 4mm narrower, 27mm shorter, and 24mm thinner than K-3 II.

X100V is 222 g lighter than K-3 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 53mm X100V · 78mm K-3 II

Sensor size, to scale

X100V

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

K-3 II

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X100V: mount data unavailable

K-3 II

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX100VK-3 II
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
3.0Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X100V

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 101 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    478 g vs 700 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

K-3 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.5, 101.5, 77.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 17 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only K-3 II supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X100V

Pros

  • Classic design
  • Leaf shutter
  • Film simulations
  • Proven street camera

Cons

  • Superseded by X100VI
  • Fixed lens
  • No IBIS

K-3 II

Pros

  • Pixel shift hi-res
  • No AA filter
  • GPS built-in
  • Weather sealed

Cons

  • Superseded by K-3 III
  • DSLR
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X100V and K-3 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X100V
K-3 II
Resolution
26.1 MP+7%
24.4 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
X100V
K-3 II
Aperture
f/2.0
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
X100V
K-3 II
Processor
X-Processor 4
Image processor
X100V
K-3 II
ISO min (native)
160
100−60 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
25,600+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
X100V
K-3 II
Shutter type
Lens Shutter + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, X100V or K-3 II?

K-3 II scores 6.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for X100V — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the X100V and K-3 II?

X100V is 26.1 MP and K-3 II is 24.4 MP, so the X100V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X100V and K-3 II have in-body image stabilization?

X100V does not have IBIS, while K-3 II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X100V or the K-3 II?

X100V reaches 30 fps electronic. K-3 II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X100V and K-3 II?

X100V weighs 478 g and K-3 II weighs 700 g, so the X100V is 222 g lighter.

Do the X100V and K-3 II record 4K video?

X100V: 4K up to 30p. K-3 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X100V and K-3 II weather sealed?

X100V: Yes. K-3 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the X100V and 640 shots for the K-3 II, giving the K-3 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

X100V launched at $1,399 and K-3 II at $1,099. The K-3 II is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X100V vs K-3 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.