Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X100V

Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2020

vs
GR IVx

Ricoh

GR IVx

40mm-equivalent GR IV sibling with a newly designed 26.1mm f/2.8 lens, 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 5-axis SR, 4K video, 53GB internal storage, and pocket street-camera handling. Winter 2026 planned.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Dec 2026

GR IVx is 6.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

X100V

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

GR IVx

Portrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X100V wins 3 categories·GR IVx wins 2 categories
  • BGR IVx has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
  • AX100V has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • AX100V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AX100V has higher Burst (mechanical) (11 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IVx has lower Weight (265 g vs 478 g)

Key specs at a glance

X100VGR IVx
Resolution26.1 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,800204,800
Burst30 fps4 fps
4K30 fps30 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight478 g265 g
Battery350 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X100V

128 × 75 × 53 mm

478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IVx front view

GR IVx

109 × 61 × 33 mm

265 g (0.58 lb / 9.35 oz)

X100V is 19mm wider, 14mm taller, and 20mm thicker than GR IVx.

X100V is 213 g heavier than GR IVx.

Depth (front-to-back): 53mm X100V · 33mm GR IVx

Sensor size, to scale

X100V

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR IVx

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX100VGR IVx
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
3.0Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X100V

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only X100V supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only X100V supports it

Reasons to choose

GR IVx

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 33.4

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only GR IVx supports it

  • Weight

    265 g vs 478 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 160 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 30 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X100V

Pros

  • Classic design
  • Leaf shutter
  • Film simulations
  • Proven street camera

Cons

  • Superseded by X100VI
  • Fixed lens
  • No IBIS

GR IVx

Pros

  • New 26.1mm f/2.8 GR lens (40mm equiv.)
  • GR IV 25.74MP APS-C + 5-axis SR
  • 4K 30p/24p and 53GB built-in storage
  • Snap focus, 50/71mm crops, 2-stop ND
  • Pocketable 265g body

Cons

  • Price not yet announced (listed at GR IV $1,499)
  • Winter 2026 or later — still in development as of Aug 2026
  • No built-in EVF
  • Fixed 40mm-equiv. lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X100V and GR IVx at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X100V
GR IVx
Resolution
26.1 MP+1%
25.74 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
X100V
GR IVx
Aperture
f/2.0
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
40 mm
X100V
GR IVx
Processor
X-Processor 4
GR ENGINE 7
X100V
GR IVx
ISO min (native)
160
100−60 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
204,800+4 stops
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
204,800
X100V
GR IVx
Shutter type
Lens Shutter + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, X100V or GR IVx?

X100V scores 7.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IVx — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the X100V and GR IVx?

X100V is 26.1 MP and GR IVx is 25.74 MP, so the X100V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X100V and GR IVx have in-body image stabilization?

X100V does not have IBIS, while GR IVx has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X100V or the GR IVx?

X100V reaches 30 fps electronic. GR IVx reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X100V and GR IVx?

X100V weighs 478 g and GR IVx weighs 265 g, so the GR IVx is 213 g lighter.

Do the X100V and GR IVx record 4K video?

X100V: 4K up to 30p. GR IVx: 4K up to 30p.

Are the X100V and GR IVx weather sealed?

X100V: Yes. GR IVx: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the X100V and 250 shots for the GR IVx, giving the X100V the edge.

How much does each cost?

X100V launched at $1,399 and GR IVx at $1,499. The X100V is $100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X100V vs GR IVx vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Ricoh press materials.