Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

GoPro

MAX2

True 8K 360 action camera with twist-and-go replaceable lenses, 29MP 360 photos, 4K100 spherical slo-mo, 10-bit GP-Log, six mics, and 5m waterproof rugged body.

$500

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

vs

Sony

PXW-Z300

Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.

$8,298

Launch price

Released Oct 2025

Released within a month of each other.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

MAX2

WildlifeTravel

Wins

10categories

PXW-Z300

Sports & ActionWildlife

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

MAX2 wins 1 categories·PXW-Z300 wins 4 categories
  • BPXW-Z300 has lower AF low-light limit (-4 EV vs 0 EV)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 0)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher AF frame coverage (94 % vs 0 %)
  • AMAX2 has higher Resolution (29 MP vs 8.3 MP)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

MAX2PXW-Z300
Resolution29 MP8.3 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop8-stop
Weight580 g580 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

MAX2

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z300

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

MAX2 and PXW-Z300 share virtually identical body dimensions.

MAX2 and PXW-Z300 weigh the same.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm MAX2 · 72mm PXW-Z300

Sensor size, to scale

MAX2

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

PXW-Z300

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseMAX2PXW-Z300
Portrait
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

MAX2

  • Resolution

    29 MP vs 8.3 MP — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z300

  • AF low-light limit

    -4 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    94 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

MAX2

Pros

  • True 8K 360 video (21% more pixels vs rivals)
  • Field-replaceable twist-on lenses
  • 4K100 360 slo-mo + 5.6K60 360
  • 10-bit GP-Log + 300Mbps (GoPro Labs)
  • 4K60 single-lens + 180° HyperView POV

Cons

  • 360 workflow needs reframing in Quik
  • $100 more than HERO13 Black
  • 1/2.3-inch dual sensors
  • 8K runtime shorter than 5.6K modes

PXW-Z300

Pros

  • 3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
  • 17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
  • AI subject recognition + auto framing
  • 4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
  • Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI

Cons

  • Premium flagship pricing
  • 3CMOS not single large sensor
  • Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
  • New platform learning curve

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the MAX2 and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

MAX2
PXW-Z300
Resolution
29 MP3.5× more
8.3 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
MAX2
PXW-Z300
Processor
GP2
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
MAX2
PXW-Z300
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
MAX2
PXW-Z300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, MAX2 or PXW-Z300?

PXW-Z300 scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for MAX2 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the MAX2 and PXW-Z300?

MAX2 is 29 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the MAX2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the MAX2 and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?

MAX2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the MAX2 or the PXW-Z300?

MAX2 reaches 20 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the MAX2 and PXW-Z300?

Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.

Do the MAX2 and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?

MAX2: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the MAX2 and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?

MAX2: Yes. PXW-Z300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the MAX2 and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the MAX2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

MAX2 launched at $500 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The MAX2 is $7,798 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way MAX2 vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.