Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Hasselblad

907X & CFV 100C

Modular 100MP digital back for Hasselblad V-system and 907X body — iconic design meets modern files.

$8,199

Launch price

Released Jan 2024

vs

Hasselblad

H6D-100c

100MP medium format modular system for studio, fashion, and commercial work.

$32,995

Launch price

Released Apr 2016

907X & CFV 100C is 7.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

907X & CFV 100C

WildlifeVlogging

Wins

6categories

H6D-100c

WildlifeSports & Action

10 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

907X & CFV 100C wins 1 categories·H6D-100c wins 4 categories
  • A907X & CFV 100C has lower Weight (206 g vs 2130 g)
  • BH6D-100c has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BH6D-100c has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 120 frames)
  • BH6D-100c has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
  • BH6D-100c has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 8 fps)

Key specs at a glance

907X & CFV 100CH6D-100c
Resolution100 MP100 MP
Sensor43.8 × 32.9 mm53.4 × 40.0 mm
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop8-stop
Weight206 g2130 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

907X & CFV 100C

102 × 93 × 36 mm

206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

H6D-100c

153 × 131 × 135 mm

2130 g (4.70 lb / 75.13 oz)

907X & CFV 100C is 51mm narrower, 38mm shorter, and 99mm thinner than H6D-100c.

907X & CFV 100C is 1924 g lighter than H6D-100c.

Depth (front-to-back): 36mm 907X & CFV 100C · 135mm H6D-100c

Sensor size, to scale

907X & CFV 100C

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

H6D-100c

53.4 × 40 mm · Medium Format

2136 mm² area

1.5× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use case907X & CFV 100CH6D-100c
Portrait
6.0Good
6.0Good
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
6.0Good
Landscape
6.5Good
6.5Good
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

907X & CFV 100C

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 102, 93, 36

  • Weight

    206 g vs 2130 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

H6D-100c

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 153, 131, 135

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 7 stops — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 100 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 64
  • AF points / zonesBoth 117
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

907X & CFV 100C

Pros

  • 100MP modular back
  • V-system compatibility
  • Iconic Hasselblad design
  • Medium format look

Cons

  • Slow workflow
  • Expensive system
  • Not for fast shooting

H6D-100c

Pros

  • 100MP medium format
  • Modular system
  • Stunning detail
  • Pro tethering workflow

Cons

  • Extremely expensive
  • Not handheld friendly
  • Slow operation

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the 907X & CFV 100C and H6D-100c at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

907X & CFV 100C
H6D-100c
Resolution
100 MP
100 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format CMOS
Medium Format CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 × 32.9 mm
53.4 × 40.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
907X & CFV 100C
H6D-100c
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
907X & CFV 100C
H6D-100c
ISO min (native)
64
64
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
907X & CFV 100C
H6D-100c
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, 907X & CFV 100C or H6D-100c?

907X & CFV 100C scores 6.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for H6D-100c — 206g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the 907X & CFV 100C and H6D-100c?

Both cameras share the same 100 MP resolution.

Do the 907X & CFV 100C and H6D-100c have in-body image stabilization?

907X & CFV 100C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while H6D-100c has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the 907X & CFV 100C or the H6D-100c?

907X & CFV 100C reaches 20 fps electronic. H6D-100c reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the 907X & CFV 100C and H6D-100c?

907X & CFV 100C weighs 206 g and H6D-100c weighs 2130 g, so the 907X & CFV 100C is 1924 g lighter.

Do the 907X & CFV 100C and H6D-100c record 4K video?

907X & CFV 100C: 4K up to 60p. H6D-100c: 4K up to 60p.

Are the 907X & CFV 100C and H6D-100c weather sealed?

907X & CFV 100C: No. H6D-100c: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the 907X & CFV 100C and 520 shots for the H6D-100c, giving the 907X & CFV 100C the edge.

How much does each cost?

907X & CFV 100C launched at $8,199 and H6D-100c at $32,995. The 907X & CFV 100C is $24,796 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way 907X & CFV 100C vs H6D-100c vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.