Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Hasselblad
907X & CFV 100C
Modular 100MP digital back for Hasselblad V-system and 907X body — iconic design meets modern files.
$8,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
907X & CFV 100C is 1.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
907X & CFV 100C
5 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 117)
- B907X & CFV 100C has higher Resolution (100 MP vs 24.2 MP)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- B907X & CFV 100C has lower Weight (206 g vs 670 g)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 93 × 36 mm
206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 36mm wider, 5mm taller, and 52mm thicker than 907X & CFV 100C.
EOS R6 Mark II is 464 g heavier than 907X & CFV 100C.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 36mm 907X & CFV 100C
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 36 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
907X & CFV 100C
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
907X & CFV 100C: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
AF points / zones
1053 vs 117 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
907X & CFV 100C
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 102, 93, 36
Resolution
100 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Weight
206 g vs 670 g — lower is better
ISO min (native)
64 vs 100 — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
907X & CFV 100C
Pros
- ✓100MP modular back
- ✓V-system compatibility
- ✓Iconic Hasselblad design
- ✓Medium format look
Cons
- –Slow workflow
- –Expensive system
- –Not for fast shooting
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X & CFV 100C at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for 907X & CFV 100C — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and 907X & CFV 100C is 100 MP, so the 907X & CFV 100C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X & CFV 100C have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while 907X & CFV 100C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. 907X & CFV 100C reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and 907X & CFV 100C weighs 206 g, so the 907X & CFV 100C is 464 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X & CFV 100C record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. 907X & CFV 100C: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X & CFV 100C weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. 907X & CFV 100C: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the 907X & CFV 100C, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and 907X & CFV 100C at $8,199. The EOS R6 Mark II is $5,700 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs 907X & CFV 100C vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Hasselblad press materials.