Canon
EOS R6 V
Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased May 2026
Hasselblad
907X & CFV 100C
Modular 100MP digital back for Hasselblad V-system and 907X body — iconic design meets modern files.
$8,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
EOS R6 V is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 V
Wins
907X & CFV 100C
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 117)
- AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- B907X & CFV 100C has lower Weight (206 g vs 688 g)
- B907X & CFV 100C has higher Resolution (100 MP vs 32.5 MP)
- AEOS R6 V has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 V
142 × 83 × 80 mm
688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 93 × 36 mm
206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz)
EOS R6 V is 10mm shorter than 907X & CFV 100C but it is also 40mm wider and 44mm thicker.
EOS R6 V is 482 g heavier than 907X & CFV 100C.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 36mm 907X & CFV 100C
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 V
142 × 83 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 V
142 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 36 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 V
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
907X & CFV 100C
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 V
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
907X & CFV 100C: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 V
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7
AF points / zones
6097 vs 117 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
AA filter
Only EOS R6 V supports it
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
907X & CFV 100C
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 102, 93, 36
Weight
206 g vs 688 g — lower is better
Resolution
100 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better
ISO min (native)
64 vs 100 — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
- ✓Battery life (CIPA) — Both 640 shots
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 V
Pros
- ✓7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
- ✓4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
- ✓Active cooling for long-form recording
- ✓Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording
Cons
- –No built-in EVF
- –Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
- –Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
- –Battery grip not supported
907X & CFV 100C
Pros
- ✓100MP modular back
- ✓V-system compatibility
- ✓Iconic Hasselblad design
- ✓Medium format look
Cons
- –Slow workflow
- –Expensive system
- –Not for fast shooting
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 V and 907X & CFV 100C at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 V
Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 V or 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 V scores 10.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for 907X & CFV 100C — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and 907X & CFV 100C is 100 MP, so the 907X & CFV 100C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 V and 907X & CFV 100C have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while 907X & CFV 100C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. 907X & CFV 100C reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and 907X & CFV 100C weighs 206 g, so the 907X & CFV 100C is 482 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 V and 907X & CFV 100C record 4K video?
EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. 907X & CFV 100C: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 V and 907X & CFV 100C weather sealed?
EOS R6 V: Yes. 907X & CFV 100C: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 640 shots for the 907X & CFV 100C, giving the 907X & CFV 100C the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and 907X & CFV 100C at $8,199. The EOS R6 V is $5,700 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 V vs 907X & CFV 100C vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Hasselblad press materials.