Canon
EOS R1
Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.
$6,299
Launch priceReleased Jul 2024
Hasselblad
907X & CFV 100C
Modular 100MP digital back for Hasselblad V-system and 907X body — iconic design meets modern files.
$8,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
EOS R1 is 6 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R1
Wins
907X & CFV 100C
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 117)
- B907X & CFV 100C has lower Weight (206 g vs 920 g)
- B907X & CFV 100C has higher Resolution (100 MP vs 24.2 MP)
- AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 3,690,000)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R1
158 × 150 × 87 mm
920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 93 × 36 mm
206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz)
EOS R1 is 56mm wider, 57mm taller, and 51mm thicker than 907X & CFV 100C.
EOS R1 is 714 g heavier than 907X & CFV 100C.
Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 36mm 907X & CFV 100C
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R1
158 × 150 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R1
158 × 87 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
907X & CFV 100C
102 × 36 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R1
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
907X & CFV 100C
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R1
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
907X & CFV 100C: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R1
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B
AF points / zones
1053 vs 117 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
EVF resolution
9,440,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
Reasons to choose
907X & CFV 100C
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 102, 93, 36
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
Weight
206 g vs 920 g — lower is better
Resolution
100 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
ISO min (native)
64 vs 100 — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R1
Pros
- ✓40fps electronic burst
- ✓24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
- ✓Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
- ✓6K RAW and 4K 120p video
- ✓Dual CFexpress Type B slots
Cons
- –24MP resolution
- –Very expensive
- –Large integrated-grip body
907X & CFV 100C
Pros
- ✓100MP modular back
- ✓V-system compatibility
- ✓Iconic Hasselblad design
- ✓Medium format look
Cons
- –Slow workflow
- –Expensive system
- –Not for fast shooting
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and 907X & CFV 100C at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R1
Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R1 or 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R1 scores 10.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for 907X & CFV 100C — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and 907X & CFV 100C is 100 MP, so the 907X & CFV 100C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R1 and 907X & CFV 100C have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while 907X & CFV 100C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. 907X & CFV 100C reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and 907X & CFV 100C?
EOS R1 weighs 920 g and 907X & CFV 100C weighs 206 g, so the 907X & CFV 100C is 714 g lighter.
Do the EOS R1 and 907X & CFV 100C record 4K video?
EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. 907X & CFV 100C: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R1 and 907X & CFV 100C weather sealed?
EOS R1: Yes. 907X & CFV 100C: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 640 shots for the 907X & CFV 100C, giving the EOS R1 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and 907X & CFV 100C at $8,199. The EOS R1 is $1,900 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs 907X & CFV 100C vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Hasselblad press materials.