Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

M (Typ 240)

24MP CMOS Leica M with live view, 1080p video, and weather sealing — the digital M modernized.

$6,950

Launch price

Released Sep 2012

vs
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

Q3 is 10.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

M (Typ 240)

WildlifePortrait

Wins

5categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

M (Typ 240) wins 2 categories·Q3 wins 3 categories
  • BQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • BQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24 MP)
  • BQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • AM (Typ 240) has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AM (Typ 240) has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

M (Typ 240)Q3
Resolution24 MP60.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,600100,000
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight680 g743 g
Battery640 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

M (Typ 240)

139 × 80 × 42 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

M (Typ 240) is 50mm thinner than Q3 but it is also 9mm wider.

M (Typ 240) is 63 g lighter than Q3.

Depth (front-to-back): 42mm M (Typ 240) · 92mm Q3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

M (Typ 240)

139 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

M (Typ 240)

139 × 42 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

M (Typ 240)

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseM (Typ 240)Q3
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

M (Typ 240)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139, 42

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only M (Typ 240) supports it

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only M (Typ 240) supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only M (Typ 240) supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only M (Typ 240) supports it

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 92

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

M (Typ 240)

Pros

  • 24MP CMOS M
  • Live view added
  • Weather sealed
  • Maestro processor

Cons

  • Superseded by M10
  • Slow AF
  • Heavy for M body

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the M (Typ 240) and Q3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

M (Typ 240)
Q3
Resolution
24 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
M (Typ 240)
Q3
Aperture
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
M (Typ 240)
Q3
Processor
Maestro IV
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
M (Typ 240)
Q3
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
100,000+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
100,000
M (Typ 240)
Q3
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, M (Typ 240) or Q3?

M (Typ 240) scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Q3 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the M (Typ 240) and Q3?

M (Typ 240) is 24 MP and Q3 is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the M (Typ 240) and Q3 have in-body image stabilization?

M (Typ 240) has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while Q3 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the M (Typ 240) or the Q3?

M (Typ 240) reaches 20 fps electronic. Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the M (Typ 240) and Q3?

M (Typ 240) weighs 680 g and Q3 weighs 743 g, so the M (Typ 240) is 63 g lighter.

Do the M (Typ 240) and Q3 record 4K video?

M (Typ 240): 4K up to 60p. Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the M (Typ 240) and Q3 weather sealed?

M (Typ 240): Yes. Q3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the M (Typ 240) and 350 shots for the Q3, giving the M (Typ 240) the edge.

How much does each cost?

M (Typ 240) launched at $6,950 and Q3 at $5,995. The Q3 is $955 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way M (Typ 240) vs Q3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica press materials.