Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

Q2

47MP full-frame fixed-lens compact with Summilux 28mm f/1.7 and weather sealing.

$4,995

Launch price

Released Mar 2019

vs
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

Q3 is 4.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Q2

WildlifePortrait

Wins

3categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q2 wins 3 categories·Q3 wins 2 categories
  • AQ2 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • AQ2 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AQ2 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • BQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 51,200)

Key specs at a glance

Q2Q3
Resolution47.3 MP60.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200100,000
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight718 g743 g
Battery520 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q2

130 × 80 × 92 mm

718 g (1.58 lb / 25.33 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Q2 and Q3 share virtually identical body dimensions.

Q2 is 25 g lighter than Q3.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q2 · 92mm Q3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q2

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q2

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q2

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ2Q3
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q2

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only Q2 supports it

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only Q2 supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Q2 supports it

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 47.3 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q2

Pros

  • 47MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm f/1.7
  • Weather sealed
  • Iconic one-camera solution

Cons

  • Fixed 28mm lens
  • Expensive
  • Superseded by Q3

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q2 and Q3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q2
Q3
Resolution
47.3 MP
60.3 MP+27%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q2
Q3
Aperture
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
Q2
Q3
Processor
Maestro IV
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
Q2
Q3
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
51,200
100,000+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
100,000
Q2
Q3
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, Q2 or Q3?

Q2 scores 10.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Q3 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the Q2 and Q3?

Q2 is 47.3 MP and Q3 is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q2 and Q3 have in-body image stabilization?

Q2 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Q3 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q2 or the Q3?

Q2 reaches 30 fps electronic. Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q2 and Q3?

Q2 weighs 718 g and Q3 weighs 743 g, so the Q2 is 25 g lighter.

Do the Q2 and Q3 record 4K video?

Q2: 4K up to 60p. Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q2 and Q3 weather sealed?

Q2: Yes. Q3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the Q2 and 350 shots for the Q3, giving the Q2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q2 launched at $4,995 and Q3 at $5,995. The Q2 is $1,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q2 vs Q3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica press materials.