Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

Q2

47MP full-frame fixed-lens compact with Summilux 28mm f/1.7 and weather sealing.

$4,995

Launch price

Released Mar 2019

vs
SL3

Leica

SL3

60MP L-mount flagship with 8K video and Leica color science.

$6,995

Launch price

Released Mar 2024

SL3 is 5.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

Q2

WildlifePortrait

Wins

4categories

SL3

LandscapeVideo & Hybrid

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q2 wins 2 categories·SL3 wins 3 categories
  • BSL3 has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BSL3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BSL3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 51,200)
  • AQ2 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 7 fps)
  • AQ2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

Q2SL3
Resolution47.3 MP60.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200100,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight718 g769 g
Battery520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q2

130 × 80 × 92 mm

718 g (1.58 lb / 25.33 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

SL3 front view

SL3

141 × 108 × 85 mm

769 g (1.70 lb / 27.13 oz)

Q2 is 11mm narrower and 28mm shorter than SL3 but it is also 7mm thicker.

Q2 is 51 g lighter than SL3.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q2 · 85mm SL3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q2

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3 back view

SL3

141 × 108 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q2

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3 top view

SL3

141 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q2

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

SL3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Q2: mount data unavailable

SL3

✓ more lenses

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ2SL3
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
8.5Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q2

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only Q2 supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 7 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

  • Weight

    718 g vs 769 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

SL3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.2, 108, 84.6

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only SL3 supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 47.3 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q2

Pros

  • 47MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm f/1.7
  • Weather sealed
  • Iconic one-camera solution

Cons

  • Fixed 28mm lens
  • Expensive
  • Superseded by Q3

SL3

Pros

  • 60MP
  • 8K video
  • Leica build
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Heavy
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q2 and SL3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q2
SL3
Resolution
47.3 MP
60.3 MP+27%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q2
SL3
Processor
Maestro IV
Maestro IV
Q2
SL3
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
51,200
100,000+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
100,000
Q2
SL3
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical focal-plane + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, Q2 or SL3?

Q2 scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for SL3 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the Q2 and SL3?

Q2 is 47.3 MP and SL3 is 60.3 MP, so the SL3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q2 and SL3 have in-body image stabilization?

Q2 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while SL3 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q2 or the SL3?

Q2 reaches 30 fps electronic. SL3 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q2 and SL3?

Q2 weighs 718 g and SL3 weighs 769 g, so the Q2 is 51 g lighter.

Do the Q2 and SL3 record 4K video?

Q2: 4K up to 60p. SL3: 8K / C8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q2 and SL3 weather sealed?

Q2: Yes. SL3: Yes.

How much does each cost?

Q2 launched at $4,995 and SL3 at $6,995. The Q2 is $2,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q2 vs SL3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica press materials.