Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Released May 2023

Q3 is 6 months newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

4categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·Q3 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 350 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIQ3
Resolution24.2 MP60.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,400100,000
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g743 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm thinner than Q3 but it is also 8mm wider and 18mm taller.

EOS R6 Mark II is 63 g lighter than Q3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 92mm Q3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Q3: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIQ3
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Q3
Resolution
24.2 MP
60.3 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Q3
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
AF points / zones
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
Q3
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps3× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Q3
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
L-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264, ProRes
EOS R6 Mark II
Q3
Weight
680 g−63 g less
743 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
130 × 80 × 92 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R6 Mark II or Q3?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for Q3 — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Q3?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Q3 is 60.3 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Q3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while q3 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Q3?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Q3?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Q3 weighs 743 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 63 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Q3 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Q3 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Q3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the Q3, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Q3 at $5,995. The EOS R6 Mark II is $3,496 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Leica press materials.