Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

vs

OM System

Tough TG-6

Olympus-era rugged waterproof compact with 12MP BSI sensor, f/2.0 4x zoom, 4K30 video, 1cm macro, 15m waterproof, and TruePic VIII — predecessor to TG-7.

$449

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

Q3 is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

3categories

Tough TG-6

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 3 categories·Tough TG-6 wins 2 categories
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 12 MP)
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BTough TG-6 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 350 shots)
  • BTough TG-6 has higher Burst (mechanical) (6 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Q3Tough TG-6
Resolution60.3 MP12 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps11 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight743 g580 g
Battery350 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Tough TG-6

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Q3 is 4mm narrower and 11mm shorter than Tough TG-6 but it is also 20mm thicker.

Q3 is 163 g heavier than Tough TG-6.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 72mm Tough TG-6

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Tough TG-6

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Tough TG-6

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Tough TG-6

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3Tough TG-6
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 12 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Q3 supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Weather sealing

    Only Q3 supports it

  • Touchscreen

    Only Q3 supports it

Reasons to choose

Tough TG-6

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AA filter

    Only Tough TG-6 supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Tough TG-6 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    6 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 743 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Tough TG-6

Pros

  • 15m waterproof + 2.1m shockproof
  • f/2.0 25-100mm equivalent zoom
  • 1cm Variable Macro System
  • 4K30 + 1080p120 slow-mo
  • Built-in GPS + fisheye converter support

Cons

  • 1/2.3-inch small sensor
  • Superseded by TG-7 (no USB-C)
  • Fixed non-touch LCD
  • Micro USB 2.0 only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and Tough TG-6 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
Tough TG-6
Resolution
60.3 MP5× more
12 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Q3
Tough TG-6
Aperture
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
Q3
Tough TG-6
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
TruePic VIII
Q3
Tough TG-6
ISO min (native)
50−50 less
100
ISO max (native)
100,000+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
102,400
Q3
Tough TG-6
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 or Tough TG-6?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Tough TG-6 — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and Tough TG-6?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and Tough TG-6 is 12 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Q3 and Tough TG-6?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while Tough TG-6 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the Tough TG-6?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. Tough TG-6 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and Tough TG-6?

Q3 weighs 743 g and Tough TG-6 weighs 580 g, so the Tough TG-6 is 163 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and Tough TG-6 record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. Tough TG-6: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q3 and Tough TG-6 weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. Tough TG-6: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 640 shots for the Tough TG-6, giving the Tough TG-6 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and Tough TG-6 at $449. The Tough TG-6 is $5,546 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 vs Tough TG-6 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and OM System press materials.