Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Released May 2023

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S5 II

Phase-detect L-mount hybrid with 6K open gate and strong video tools.

$1,999

Released Jan 2023

Q3 is 5 months newer.

Wins

5categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

6categories

Lumix S5 II

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 2 categories·Lumix S5 II wins 3 categories
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (9 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

Q3Lumix S5 II
Resolution60.3 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max100,00051,200
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo5-stop
Weight743 g740 g
Battery350 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Lumix S5 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)

Q3 is 4mm narrower and 22mm shorter than Lumix S5 II but it is also 2mm thicker.

Q3 is 3 g heavier than Lumix S5 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 90mm Lumix S5 II

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix S5 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3Lumix S5 II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,680,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S5 II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Burst (mechanical)

    9 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Lumix S5 II supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MP4

  • In-body stabilization

    Only Lumix S5 II supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix S5 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

Lumix S5 II

Pros

  • Phase-detect AF finally
  • 6K open gate
  • IBIS
  • Great value

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • L-mount size
  • AF still behind Canon/Sony

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
Lumix S5 II
Resolution
60.3 MP2.5× more
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
Lumix S5 II
AF system
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Q3
Lumix S5 II
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
9 fps2.3× more
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
30 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
200 frames
Q3
Lumix S5 II
Max resolution
8K
6K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
200 Mbps+33%
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
L-Log / HLG
V-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264, ProRes
H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
Q3
Lumix S5 II
Weight
743 g
740 g−3 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
130 × 80 × 92 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, Q3 or Lumix S5 II?

Lumix S5 II scores 8.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for Q3 — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and Lumix S5 II?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and Lumix S5 II is 24.2 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and Lumix S5 II have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while lumix S5 II has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the Lumix S5 II?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. Lumix S5 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and Lumix S5 II?

Q3 weighs 743 g and Lumix S5 II weighs 740 g, so the Lumix S5 II is 3 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and Lumix S5 II record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. Lumix S5 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q3 and Lumix S5 II weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. Lumix S5 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 370 shots for the Lumix S5 II, giving the Lumix S5 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and Lumix S5 II at $1,999. The Lumix S5 II is $3,996 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.