Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Released May 2023

vs

Pentax

K-3 Mark III

APS-C DSLR flagship with optical viewfinder and weather sealing.

$1,999

Released Apr 2021

Q3 is 2.1 years newer.

Wins

5categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

5categories

K-3 Mark III

WildlifeTravel

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 3 categories·K-3 Mark III wins 2 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 25.7 MP)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

Q3K-3 Mark III
Resolution60.3 MP25.7 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo7-stop
Weight743 g520 g
Battery350 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

Q3 is 8mm narrower and 18mm shorter than K-3 Mark III but it is also 4mm thicker.

Q3 is 223 g heavier than K-3 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 88mm K-3 Mark III

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

K-3 Mark III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Q3: mount data unavailable

K-3 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3K-3 Mark III
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
4.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 25.7 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-3 Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only K-3 Mark III supports it

  • In-body stabilization

    Only K-3 Mark III supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only K-3 Mark III supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only K-3 Mark III supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

K-3 Mark III

Pros

  • Optical viewfinder
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS in DSLR

Cons

  • DSLR system declining
  • APS-C
  • Limited video

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
K-3 Mark III
Resolution
60.3 MP2.3× more
25.7 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
K-3 Mark III
AF system
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
SAFOX 12
AF points / zones
101
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Q3
K-3 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
8 fps2× more
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
20 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
120 frames
Q3
K-3 Mark III
Max resolution
8K
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
L-Log / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264, ProRes
H.265, H.264
Q3
K-3 Mark III
Weight
743 g
520 g−223 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
130 × 80 × 92 mm
138 × 98 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, Q3 or K-3 Mark III?

K-3 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Q3 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and K-3 Mark III?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and K-3 Mark III is 25.7 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and K-3 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while k-3 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the K-3 Mark III?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. K-3 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and K-3 Mark III?

Q3 weighs 743 g and K-3 Mark III weighs 520 g, so the K-3 Mark III is 223 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and K-3 Mark III record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. K-3 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q3 and K-3 Mark III weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. K-3 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 640 shots for the K-3 Mark III, giving the K-3 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and K-3 Mark III at $1,999. The K-3 Mark III is $3,996 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.