Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

vs

RED

KOMODO-X

Global-shutter Super 35 cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, RF mount, and a larger body than KOMODO 6K.

$9,995

Launch price

Released Aug 2023

KOMODO-X is 3 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

6categories

KOMODO-X

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 3 categories·KOMODO-X wins 2 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 19.9 MP)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BKOMODO-X has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BKOMODO-X has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Q3KOMODO-X
Resolution60.3 MP19.9 MP
SensorFull Frame27.03 × 14.26 mm
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps20 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo7-stop
Weight743 g1130 g
Battery350 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

KOMODO-X

114 × 101 × 71 mm

1130 g (2.49 lb / 39.86 oz)

Q3 is 21mm shorter than KOMODO-X but it is also 16mm wider and 21mm thicker.

Q3 is 387 g lighter than KOMODO-X.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 71mm KOMODO-X

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

KOMODO-X

114 × 101 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

KOMODO-X

114 × 71 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

KOMODO-X

27.03 × 14.26 mm · APS-C

385 mm² area

2.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3KOMODO-X
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 19.9 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    743 g vs 1130 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

KOMODO-X

  • Codecs

    Adds REDCODE RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 114, 101, 71

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only KOMODO-X supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only KOMODO-X supports it

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only KOMODO-X supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

KOMODO-X

Pros

  • Global shutter 6K
  • REDCODE RAW
  • Canon RF mount
  • Compact cinema form

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Cinema-first ergonomics
  • Premium media costs

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and KOMODO-X at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
KOMODO-X
Resolution
60.3 MP3× more
19.9 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Super 35 Global Shutter CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
27.03 × 14.26 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
KOMODO-X
Aperture
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
Q3
KOMODO-X
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
Image processor
Q3
KOMODO-X
ISO min (native)
50−50 less
100
ISO max (native)
100,000+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
102,400
Q3
KOMODO-X
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Q3 or KOMODO-X?

KOMODO-X scores 9.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for Q3 — 20fps burst — fast action ready.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and KOMODO-X?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and KOMODO-X is 19.9 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and KOMODO-X have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while KOMODO-X has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the KOMODO-X?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. KOMODO-X reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and KOMODO-X?

Q3 weighs 743 g and KOMODO-X weighs 1130 g, so the Q3 is 387 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and KOMODO-X record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. KOMODO-X: 6K 17:9 (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Q3 and KOMODO-X weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. KOMODO-X: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 640 shots for the KOMODO-X, giving the KOMODO-X the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and KOMODO-X at $9,995. The Q3 is $4,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 vs KOMODO-X vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and RED press materials.