Leica
Q3
Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.
$5,995
Released May 2023
Sony
ZV-1 II
Creator compact with 18–50mm zoom, Product Showcase, and vlog-first controls.
$899
Released May 2023
Released within a month of each other.
Wins
Q3
Wins
ZV-1 II
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 12,800)
- BZV-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (24 fps vs 4 fps)
- AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 20.1 MP)
- BZV-1 II has lower Weight (292 g vs 743 g)
- AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 125)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
Q3
130 × 80 × 92 mm
743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)
ZV-1 II
106 × 60 × 47 mm
292 g (0.64 lb / 10.30 oz)
Q3 is 25mm wider, 20mm taller, and 45mm thicker than ZV-1 II.
Q3 is 451 g heavier than ZV-1 II.
Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 47mm ZV-1 II
Sensor size, to scale
Q3
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
ZV-1 II
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″
116 mm² area
7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Q3
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130, 80, 92
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
100,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Resolution
60.3 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds H.265, ProRes
ISO min (native)
50 vs 125 — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
ZV-1 II
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 105.5, 60, 46.7
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I, Memory Stick Duo
Burst (mechanical)
24 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Weight
292 g vs 743 g — lower is better
AA filter
Only ZV-1 II supports it
Codecs
Adds XAVC S
Microphone jack (3.5mm)
Only ZV-1 II supports it
Burst (electronic)
24 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 150 Mbps
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Q3
Pros
- ✓60MP full-frame
- ✓Summilux 28mm lens
- ✓Built like a tank
- ✓Unique aesthetic
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –Very expensive
- –No interchangeable system
ZV-1 II
Pros
- ✓Built for vlogging
- ✓18–50mm versatile zoom
- ✓Bokeh Switch
Cons
- –1-inch sensor
- –Fixed lens
- –No EVF
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, Q3 or ZV-1 II?
Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for ZV-1 II — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.
What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and ZV-1 II?
Q3 is 60.3 MP and ZV-1 II is 20.1 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the Q3 and ZV-1 II have in-body image stabilization?
Q3 does not have IBIS, while zV-1 II does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the ZV-1 II?
Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. ZV-1 II reaches 24 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the Q3 and ZV-1 II?
Q3 weighs 743 g and ZV-1 II weighs 292 g, so the ZV-1 II is 451 g lighter.
Do the Q3 and ZV-1 II record 4K video?
Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. ZV-1 II: 4K up to 30p.
Are the Q3 and ZV-1 II weather sealed?
Q3: Yes. ZV-1 II: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 290 shots for the ZV-1 II, giving the Q3 the edge.
How much does each cost?
Q3 launched at $5,995 and ZV-1 II at $899. The ZV-1 II is $5,096 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.