Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

vs

Z CAM

E2-M4

Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jun 2023

Released within a month of each other.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

6categories

E2-M4

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 4 categories·E2-M4 wins 1 categories
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 10.28 MP)
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BE2-M4 has lower Weight (370 g vs 743 g)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

Q3E2-M4
Resolution60.3 MP10.28 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps15 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo6-stop
Weight743 g370 g
Battery350 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

E2-M4

91 × 66 × 72 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

Q3 is 39mm wider, 14mm taller, and 20mm thicker than E2-M4.

Q3 is 373 g heavier than E2-M4.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 72mm E2-M4

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

E2-M4

91 × 66 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

E2-M4

91 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

E2-M4

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Q3: mount data unavailable

E2-M4

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3E2-M4
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 10.28 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • EVF magnification

    0.79 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

E2-M4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 91, 66, 72

  • Weight

    370 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • AA filter

    Only E2-M4 supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only E2-M4 supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only E2-M4 supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds ZRAW

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 15 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

E2-M4

Pros

  • Tiny MFT cinema box
  • 4K 120p
  • ZRAW internal
  • Affordable cinema entry

Cons

  • No screen
  • MFT sensor
  • Manual focus workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
E2-M4
Resolution
60.3 MP5.9× more
10.28 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Q3
E2-M4
Aperture
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
Q3
E2-M4
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
Image processor
Q3
E2-M4
ISO min (native)
50−50 less
100
ISO max (native)
100,000+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
102,400
Q3
E2-M4
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Q3 or E2-M4?

E2-M4 scores 9.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for Q3 — 15fps burst — fast action ready.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and E2-M4?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the E2-M4?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and E2-M4?

Q3 weighs 743 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the E2-M4 is 373 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and E2-M4 record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.

Are the Q3 and E2-M4 weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. E2-M4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $4,696 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and Z CAM press materials.