Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-1

First OM System flagship with cross-type AF and 50fps burst.

$2,199

Released Feb 2022

vs

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Compact IP53 Micro Four Thirds body with 20MP Live MOS sensor, 7.5-stop Sync IS, 30fps burst, 4K video, and USB-C charging.

$1,199

Released Jun 2025

OM-5 Mark II is 3.3 years newer.

Wins

5categories

OM-1

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

2categories

OM-5 Mark II

TravelSports & Action

10 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 wins 4 categories·OM-5 Mark II wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AOM-1 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AOM-1 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AOM-1 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BOM-5 Mark II has lower Weight (417 g vs 599 g)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1OM-5 Mark II
Resolution20.4 MP20.4 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max102,400102,400
Burst120 fps30 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop6.5-stop
Weight599 g417 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 52 mm

417 g (0.92 lb / 14.71 oz)

OM-1 is 10mm wider, 6mm taller, and 21mm thicker than OM-5 Mark II.

OM-1 is 182 g heavier than OM-5 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 · 52mm OM-5 Mark II

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1OM-5 Mark II
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 6.5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 52

  • Weight

    417 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 20.4 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 80
  • ISO max (native)Both 102,400
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1

Pros

  • 50fps burst
  • Great weather sealing
  • Computational modes

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Superseded by OM-1 II
  • Smaller than FF

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact weather-sealed body
  • 7.5-stop Sync IS
  • 30fps burst
  • 4K vertical video

Cons

  • 20MP non-stacked sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Smaller EVF than OM-1

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1
OM-5 Mark II
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.4 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
4/3 Live MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-1
OM-5 Mark II
AF system
1053-point Cross Quad Pixel phase detection AF
121-point all cross-type phase detection AF
AF points / zones
10538.7× more
121
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
-8 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
OM-1
OM-5 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
OM-1
OM-5 Mark II
Max resolution
4K / C4K
4K / C4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
OM-Log / HLG
OM-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.264, H.265, MOV
H.264, H.265, MOV
OM-1
OM-5 Mark II
Weight
599 g
417 g−182 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm
125.3 × 85.2 × 52 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-1 or OM-5 Mark II?

OM-1 scores 8.5/10 versus 6.5/10 for OM-5 Mark II — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 and OM-5 Mark II?

Both cameras share the same 20.4 MP resolution.

Do the OM-1 and OM-5 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-5 Mark II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 or the OM-5 Mark II?

OM-1 reaches 120 fps electronic. OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 and OM-5 Mark II?

OM-1 weighs 599 g and OM-5 Mark II weighs 417 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 182 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 and OM-5 Mark II record 4K video?

OM-1: 4K up to 60p. OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the OM-1 and OM-5 Mark II weather sealed?

OM-1: Yes. OM-5 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 and 640 shots for the OM-5 Mark II, giving the OM-5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 launched at $2,199 and OM-5 Mark II at $1,199. The OM-5 Mark II is $1,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.