Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Compact IP53 Micro Four Thirds body with 20MP Live MOS sensor, 7.5-stop Sync IS, 30fps burst, 4K video, and USB-C charging.

$1,199

Released Jun 2025

OM-5 Mark II is 2.6 years newer.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

4categories

OM-5 Mark II

TravelSports & Action

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·OM-5 Mark II wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • BOM-5 Mark II has lower Weight (417 g vs 680 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIOM-5 Mark II
Resolution24.2 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,400102,400
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop6.5-stop
Weight680 g417 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 52 mm

417 g (0.92 lb / 14.71 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 13mm wider, 13mm taller, and 36mm thicker than OM-5 Mark II.

EOS R6 Mark II is 263 g heavier than OM-5 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 52mm OM-5 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 52 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIOM-5 Mark II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Dogs, Cats, Horses…

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 52

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    417 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 102,400
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact weather-sealed body
  • 7.5-stop Sync IS
  • 30fps burst
  • 4K vertical video

Cons

  • 20MP non-stacked sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Smaller EVF than OM-1

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
OM-5 Mark II
Resolution
24.2 MP+19%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
4/3 Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
OM-5 Mark II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
121-point all cross-type phase detection AF
AF points / zones
10538.7× more
121
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-8 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
EOS R6 Mark II
OM-5 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
OM-5 Mark II
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K / C4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
OM-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264, H.265, MOV
EOS R6 Mark II
OM-5 Mark II
Weight
680 g
417 g−263 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
125.3 × 85.2 × 52 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or OM-5 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-5 Mark II — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-5 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-5 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-5 Mark II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the OM-5 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-5 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and OM-5 Mark II weighs 417 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 263 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-5 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and OM-5 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. OM-5 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the OM-5 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and OM-5 Mark II at $1,199. The OM-5 Mark II is $1,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.