Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Compact IP53 Micro Four Thirds body with 20MP Live MOS sensor, 7.5-stop Sync IS, 30fps burst, 4K video, and USB-C charging.

$1,199

Released Jun 2025

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 1 year newer.

Wins

5categories

OM-5 Mark II

TravelSports & Action

Wins

7categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 Mark II wins 0 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 121)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 20.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5 Mark IIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution20.4 MP66.8 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBIS6.5-stopYes
Weight417 g713 g
Battery640 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 52 mm

417 g (0.92 lb / 14.71 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

OM-5 Mark II is 7mm narrower, 12mm shorter, and 31mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI.

OM-5 Mark II is 296 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 52mm OM-5 Mark II · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 52 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5 Mark IIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 52

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

  • Weight

    417 g vs 713 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 121 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact weather-sealed body
  • 7.5-stop Sync IS
  • 30fps burst
  • 4K vertical video

Cons

  • 20MP non-stacked sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Smaller EVF than OM-1

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
20.4 MP
66.8 MP3.3× more
Sensor type
4/3 Live MOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
121-point all cross-type phase detection AF
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
121
7596.3× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
4K / C4K
8K
4K max frame rate
30 fps
120 fps4× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
600 Mbps4× more
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
OM-Log / HLG
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
H.264, H.265, MOV
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
417 g−296 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
125.3 × 85.2 × 52 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, OM-5 Mark II or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-5 Mark II — 66.8MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 Mark II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the Alpha 7R VI?

OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?

OM-5 Mark II weighs 417 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 296 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

OM-5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the OM-5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,199 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The OM-5 Mark II is $3,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.