Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Compact IP53 Micro Four Thirds body with 20MP Live MOS sensor, 7.5-stop Sync IS, 30fps burst, 4K video, and USB-C charging.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Jun 2025

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 6 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

OM-5 Mark II

TravelSports & Action

Wins

7categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 Mark II wins 1 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 121)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5 Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Resolution20.4 MP33 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBIS6.5-stop7.5-stop
Weight417 g695 g
Battery640 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 52 mm

417 g (0.92 lb / 14.71 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

OM-5 Mark II is 5mm narrower, 11mm shorter, and 30mm thinner than Alpha 7 V.

OM-5 Mark II is 278 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 52mm OM-5 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 52 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5 Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 52

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    417 g vs 695 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 121 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 7 V supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7 V supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 10 fps
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact weather-sealed body
  • 7.5-stop Sync IS
  • 30fps burst
  • 4K vertical video

Cons

  • 20MP non-stacked sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Smaller EVF than OM-1

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
20.4 MP
33 MP+62%
Sensor type
4/3 Live MOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Processor
TruePic IX
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec
OM-5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
AF system
121-point all cross-type phase detection AF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
121
7596.3× more
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, OM-5 Mark II or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-5 Mark II — 33MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 Mark II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the Alpha 7 V?

OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

OM-5 Mark II weighs 417 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 278 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

OM-5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the OM-5 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,199 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The OM-5 Mark II is $1,700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.