Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

Lumix FZ300

Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.

$599

Launch price

Released Jul 2015

vs
Lumix S1 II

Panasonic

Lumix S1 II

24MP partially stacked full-frame hybrid with high frame rate video, fast burst shooting, and 15-stop V-Log.

$3,199

Launch price

Released May 2025

Lumix S1 II is 9.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

Lumix FZ300

Wins

14categories

Lumix S1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix FZ300 wins 0 categories·Lumix S1 II wins 5 categories
  • BLumix S1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BLumix S1 II has higher Max video bit rate (1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • BLumix S1 II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BLumix S1 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 20 frames)
  • BLumix S1 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 6,400)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix FZ300Lumix S1 II
Resolution12.1 MP24.1 MP
Sensor6.17 x 4.55 mmFull Frame
ISO max6,40051,200
Burst60 fps70 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight691 g800 g
Battery380 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 × 117 mm

691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix S1 II front view

Lumix S1 II

134 × 102 × 92 mm

800 g (1.76 lb / 28.22 oz)

Lumix FZ300 is 3mm narrower and 11mm shorter than Lumix S1 II but it is also 25mm thicker.

Lumix FZ300 is 109 g lighter than Lumix S1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 117mm Lumix FZ300 · 92mm Lumix S1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix S1 II back view

Lumix S1 II

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Lumix FZ300

132 × 117 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix S1 II top view

Lumix S1 II

134 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix FZ300

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

Lumix S1 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

30.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix FZ300Lumix S1 II
Portrait
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ300

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds AVCHD

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    691 g vs 800 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    380 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 91.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 20 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 6,400 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix FZ300

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
  • Weather resistant
  • 4K video
  • Great reach

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • 12MP
  • Bridge-camera bulk

Lumix S1 II

Pros

  • Partially stacked full-frame sensor
  • 6K open-gate video
  • 4K 120p
  • Fast Phase Hybrid AF

Cons

  • Premium hybrid body
  • 24MP stills resolution
  • Large L-mount lenses

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix FZ300
Lumix S1 II
Resolution
12.1 MP
24.1 MP+99%
Sensor type
1/2.3-inch High Sensitivity MOS
35mm Full-Frame Partially Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
6.17 x 4.55 mm
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S1 II
Aperture
f/2.8 constant
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25-600 mm
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S1 II
Processor
Venus Engine
Venus Engine
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
6,400
51,200+3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
6,400
204,800
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S1 II
Shutter type
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Lumix FZ300 or Lumix S1 II?

Lumix S1 II scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S1 II?

Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP and Lumix S1 II is 24.1 MP, so the Lumix S1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS, while Lumix S1 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix FZ300 or the Lumix S1 II?

Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic. Lumix S1 II reaches 70 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S1 II?

Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g and Lumix S1 II weighs 800 g, so the Lumix FZ300 is 109 g lighter.

Do the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S1 II record 4K video?

Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p. Lumix S1 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S1 II weather sealed?

Lumix FZ300: Yes. Lumix S1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 380 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix FZ300 and 350 shots for the Lumix S1 II, giving the Lumix FZ300 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix FZ300 launched at $599 and Lumix S1 II at $3,199. The Lumix FZ300 is $2,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Lumix FZ300 vs Lumix S1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic press materials.