Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ300

Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.

$599

Launch price

Released Jul 2015

EOS R1 is 9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

Lumix FZ300

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Lumix FZ300 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 1,440,000)
  • AEOS R1 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Lumix FZ300
Resolution24.2 MP12.1 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 x 4.55 mm
ISO max102,4006,400
Burst40 fps60 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight920 g691 g
Battery1330 shots380 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 × 117 mm

691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)

EOS R1 is 30mm thinner than Lumix FZ300 but it is also 26mm wider and 58mm taller.

EOS R1 is 229 g heavier than Lumix FZ300.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 117mm Lumix FZ300

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix FZ300

132 × 117 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix FZ300

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix FZ300: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Lumix FZ300
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 1,440,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ300

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Burst (electronic)

    60 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    691 g vs 920 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Lumix FZ300

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
  • Weather resistant
  • 4K video
  • Great reach

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • 12MP
  • Bridge-camera bulk

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Lumix FZ300
Resolution
24.2 MP2× more
12.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1/2.3-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
6.17 x 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Lumix FZ300
Aperture
f/2.8 constant
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25-600 mm
EOS R1
Lumix FZ300
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R1
Lumix FZ300
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+4 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
6,400
EOS R1
Lumix FZ300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R1 or Lumix FZ300?

EOS R1 scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ300?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ300 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Lumix FZ300?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ300?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g, so the Lumix FZ300 is 229 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ300 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ300 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Lumix FZ300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 380 shots for the Lumix FZ300, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Lumix FZ300 at $599. The Lumix FZ300 is $5,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Lumix FZ300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.