Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

Lumix FZ300

Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.

$599

Launch price

Released Jul 2015

vs
Lumix S5 II

Panasonic

Lumix S5 II

Phase-detect L-mount hybrid with 6K open gate and strong video tools.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2023

Lumix S5 II is 7.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

Lumix FZ300

Wins

13categories

Lumix S5 II

Sports & ActionPortrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix FZ300 wins 0 categories·Lumix S5 II wins 5 categories
  • BLumix S5 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 20 frames)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 6,400)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix FZ300Lumix S5 II
Resolution12.1 MP24.2 MP
Sensor6.17 x 4.55 mmFull Frame
ISO max6,40051,200
Burst60 fps30 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNo5-stop
Weight691 g740 g
Battery380 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 × 117 mm

691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix S5 II front view

Lumix S5 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)

Lumix FZ300 is 3mm narrower and 11mm shorter than Lumix S5 II but it is also 27mm thicker.

Lumix FZ300 is 49 g lighter than Lumix S5 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 117mm Lumix FZ300 · 90mm Lumix S5 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix S5 II back view

Lumix S5 II

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Lumix FZ300

132 × 117 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix S5 II top view

Lumix S5 II

134 × 90 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix FZ300

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

Lumix S5 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

30.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix FZ300Lumix S5 II
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ300

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds AVCHD

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 9 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    691 g vs 740 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    380 shots vs 370 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S5 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 20 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    180 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix FZ300

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
  • Weather resistant
  • 4K video
  • Great reach

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • 12MP
  • Bridge-camera bulk

Lumix S5 II

Pros

  • Phase-detect AF finally
  • 6K open gate
  • IBIS
  • Great value

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • L-mount size
  • AF still behind Canon/Sony

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Resolution
12.1 MP
24.2 MP2× more
Sensor type
1/2.3-inch High Sensitivity MOS
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
Sensor size
6.17 x 4.55 mm
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Aperture
f/2.8 constant
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25-600 mm
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Processor
Venus Engine
Venus Engine
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
6,400
51,200+3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
6,400
204,800
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Shutter type
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Lumix FZ300 or Lumix S5 II?

Lumix S5 II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II?

Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP and Lumix S5 II is 24.2 MP, so the Lumix S5 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS, while Lumix S5 II has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix FZ300 or the Lumix S5 II?

Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic. Lumix S5 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II?

Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g and Lumix S5 II weighs 740 g, so the Lumix FZ300 is 49 g lighter.

Do the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II record 4K video?

Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p. Lumix S5 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II weather sealed?

Lumix FZ300: Yes. Lumix S5 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 380 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix FZ300 and 370 shots for the Lumix S5 II, giving the Lumix FZ300 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix FZ300 launched at $599 and Lumix S5 II at $1,999. The Lumix FZ300 is $1,400 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Lumix FZ300 vs Lumix S5 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic press materials.