Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix FZ300

Weather-resistant bridge camera with constant f/2.8 25-600mm equivalent Leica zoom and 4K video.

$599

Released Jul 2015

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S5 II

Phase-detect L-mount hybrid with 6K open gate and strong video tools.

$1,999

Released Jan 2023

Lumix S5 II is 7.5 years newer.

Wins

4categories

Lumix FZ300

Wins

12categories

Lumix S5 II

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix FZ300 wins 0 categories·Lumix S5 II wins 5 categories
  • BLumix S5 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 20 frames)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 6,400)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher EVF resolution (3,680,000 vs 1,440,000)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix FZ300Lumix S5 II
Resolution12.1 MP24.2 MP
Sensor6.17 x 4.55 mmFull Frame
ISO max6,40051,200
Burst60 fps30 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNo5-stop
Weight691 g740 g
Battery380 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix FZ300

132 × 92 × 117 mm

691 g (1.52 lb / 24.37 oz)

Lumix S5 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)

Lumix FZ300 is 3mm narrower and 11mm shorter than Lumix S5 II but it is also 27mm thicker.

Lumix FZ300 is 49 g lighter than Lumix S5 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 117mm Lumix FZ300 · 90mm Lumix S5 II

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix FZ300

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

Lumix S5 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

30.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix FZ300Lumix S5 II
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ300

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.6, 91.5, 117.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds AVCHD

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 9 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    691 g vs 740 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    380 shots vs 370 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S5 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 20 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,680,000 vs 1,440,000 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix FZ300

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 24x zoom
  • Weather resistant
  • 4K video
  • Great reach

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • 12MP
  • Bridge-camera bulk

Lumix S5 II

Pros

  • Phase-detect AF finally
  • 6K open gate
  • IBIS
  • Great value

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • L-mount size
  • AF still behind Canon/Sony

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Resolution
12.1 MP
24.2 MP2× more
Sensor type
1/2.3-inch High Sensitivity MOS
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
Sensor size
6.17 x 4.55 mm
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
AF system
Contrast AF with DFD technology
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
49
77915.9× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+33%
9 fps
Burst (electronic)
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
20 frames
200 frames10× more
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Max resolution
4K
6K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
30 fps
60 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
100 Mbps
200 Mbps2× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
None
V-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
Lumix FZ300
Lumix S5 II
Weight
691 g−49 g less
740 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
131.6 × 91.5 × 117.1 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Lumix FZ300 or Lumix S5 II?

Lumix S5 II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for Lumix FZ300 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II?

Lumix FZ300 is 12.1 MP and Lumix S5 II is 24.2 MP, so the Lumix S5 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix FZ300 does not have IBIS, while lumix S5 II has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix FZ300 or the Lumix S5 II?

Lumix FZ300 reaches 60 fps electronic. Lumix S5 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II?

Lumix FZ300 weighs 691 g and Lumix S5 II weighs 740 g, so the Lumix FZ300 is 49 g lighter.

Do the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II record 4K video?

Lumix FZ300: 4K up to 30p. Lumix S5 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Lumix FZ300 and Lumix S5 II weather sealed?

Lumix FZ300: Yes. Lumix S5 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 380 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix FZ300 and 370 shots for the Lumix S5 II, giving the Lumix FZ300 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix FZ300 launched at $599 and Lumix S5 II at $1,999. The Lumix FZ300 is $1,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.