Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
LUMIX L10

Panasonic

LUMIX L10

Large-sensor compact with multi-aspect 20MP Four Thirds CMOS, built-in 24–75mm f/1.7–2.8 Leica zoom, 2.36M-dot EVF, fully articulating touchscreen, and 11fps burst.

$1,500

Launch price

Released Aug 2018

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

Alpha 1 II is 6.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

LUMIX L10

Wins

9categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

LUMIX L10 wins 0 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Resolution (50.1 MP vs 20 MP)

Key specs at a glance

LUMIX L10Alpha 1 II
Resolution20 MP50.1 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst11 fps30 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight508 g743 g
Battery420 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

LUMIX L10 front view

LUMIX L10

127 × 74 × 67 mm

508 g (1.12 lb / 17.92 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

LUMIX L10 is 9mm narrower, 23mm shorter, and 16mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

LUMIX L10 is 235 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 67mm LUMIX L10 · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

LUMIX L10 back view

LUMIX L10

127 × 74 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

LUMIX L10 top view

LUMIX L10

127 × 67 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

LUMIX L10

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

LUMIX L10: mount data unavailable

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLUMIX L10Alpha 1 II
Portrait
2.0Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
3.5Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
1.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

LUMIX L10

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 127, 74, 67

  • Card types

    Adds SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4

  • Weight

    508 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 759 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    50.1 MP vs 20 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

LUMIX L10

Pros

  • Four Thirds (17.3×13 mm) sensor in compact body
  • Fast Leica 24–75mm f/1.7–2.8 zoom
  • 779-point hybrid AF + 3 cm macro
  • Fully articulating 3″ touchscreen + EVF
  • 11 fps, RAW/HEIF, USB-C PD

Cons

  • Fixed lens (no interchangeable mount)
  • No built-in flash
  • No HDMI output
  • Premium price for compact class

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the LUMIX L10 and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

LUMIX L10
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
20 MP
50.1 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 x 13 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
LUMIX L10
Alpha 1 II
Aperture
f/1.7-2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24-75 mm
LUMIX L10
Alpha 1 II
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
LUMIX L10
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
32,000+0.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
102,400
LUMIX L10
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, LUMIX L10 or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for LUMIX L10 — 50.1MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the LUMIX L10 and Alpha 1 II?

LUMIX L10 is 20 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the LUMIX L10 and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

LUMIX L10 does not have IBIS, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the LUMIX L10 or the Alpha 1 II?

LUMIX L10 reaches 11 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the LUMIX L10 and Alpha 1 II?

LUMIX L10 weighs 508 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the LUMIX L10 is 235 g lighter.

Do the LUMIX L10 and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

LUMIX L10: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the LUMIX L10 and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

LUMIX L10: No. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 420 shots (CIPA) for the LUMIX L10 and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

LUMIX L10 launched at $1,500 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The LUMIX L10 is $4,999 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way LUMIX L10 vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Sony press materials.