Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
LUMIX L10

Panasonic

LUMIX L10

Large-sensor compact with multi-aspect 20MP Four Thirds CMOS, built-in 24–75mm f/1.7–2.8 Leica zoom, 2.36M-dot EVF, fully articulating touchscreen, and 11fps burst.

$1,500

Launch price

Released Aug 2018

EOS R6 Mark II is 4.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

LUMIX L10

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·LUMIX L10 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILUMIX L10
Resolution24.2 MP20 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g508 g
Battery760 shots420 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

LUMIX L10 front view

LUMIX L10

127 × 74 × 67 mm

508 g (1.12 lb / 17.92 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 11mm wider, 24mm taller, and 21mm thicker than LUMIX L10.

EOS R6 Mark II is 162 g heavier than LUMIX L10.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 67mm LUMIX L10

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

LUMIX L10 back view

LUMIX L10

127 × 74 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

LUMIX L10 top view

LUMIX L10

127 × 67 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

LUMIX L10

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

LUMIX L10: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILUMIX L10
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

LUMIX L10

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 127, 74, 67

  • Card types

    Adds SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4

  • Weight

    508 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth
  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

LUMIX L10

Pros

  • Four Thirds (17.3×13 mm) sensor in compact body
  • Fast Leica 24–75mm f/1.7–2.8 zoom
  • 779-point hybrid AF + 3 cm macro
  • Fully articulating 3″ touchscreen + EVF
  • 11 fps, RAW/HEIF, USB-C PD

Cons

  • Fixed lens (no interchangeable mount)
  • No built-in flash
  • No HDMI output
  • Premium price for compact class

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX L10 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
LUMIX L10
Resolution
24.2 MP+21%
20 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 x 13 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
LUMIX L10
Aperture
f/1.7-2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24-75 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
LUMIX L10
Processor
DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R6 Mark II
LUMIX L10
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
25,600
EOS R6 Mark II
LUMIX L10
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or LUMIX L10?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for LUMIX L10 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX L10?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and LUMIX L10 is 20 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX L10 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while LUMIX L10 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the LUMIX L10?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. LUMIX L10 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX L10?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and LUMIX L10 weighs 508 g, so the LUMIX L10 is 162 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX L10 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. LUMIX L10: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX L10 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. LUMIX L10: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 420 shots for the LUMIX L10, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and LUMIX L10 at $1,500. The LUMIX L10 is $999 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs LUMIX L10 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.