Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix S1 II

24MP partially stacked full-frame hybrid with high frame rate video, fast burst shooting, and 15-stop V-Log.

$3,199

Released May 2025

vs

Panasonic

Lumix ZS200

Pocket travel zoom with 1-inch sensor and 15x Leica lens for vacations.

$799

Released Feb 2018

Lumix S1 II is 7.3 years newer.

Wins

14categories

Lumix S1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

Lumix ZS200

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix S1 II wins 5 categories·Lumix ZS200 wins 0 categories
  • ALumix S1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • ALumix S1 II has higher Max video bit rate (1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • ALumix S1 II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • ALumix S1 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 14 frames)
  • ALumix S1 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix S1 IILumix ZS200
Resolution24.1 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max51,20012,800
Burst70 fps30 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight800 g340 g
Battery350 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix S1 II

134 × 102 × 92 mm

800 g (1.76 lb / 28.22 oz)

Lumix ZS200

111 × 66 × 45 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

Lumix S1 II is 23mm wider, 36mm taller, and 47mm thicker than Lumix ZS200.

Lumix S1 II is 460 g heavier than Lumix ZS200.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Lumix S1 II · 45mm Lumix ZS200

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix S1 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lumix ZS200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix S1 IILumix ZS200
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix S1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 91.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 14 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 12,800 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS200

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.2, 66.4, 45.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    340 g vs 800 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds AVCHD

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    370 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 10 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix S1 II

Pros

  • Partially stacked full-frame sensor
  • 6K open-gate video
  • 4K 120p
  • Fast Phase Hybrid AF

Cons

  • Premium hybrid body
  • 24MP stills resolution
  • Large L-mount lenses

Lumix ZS200

Pros

  • True pocket size
  • 1-inch sensor
  • 24–360mm zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor vs FF
  • No viewfinder grip
  • Older model

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix S1 II
Lumix ZS200
Resolution
24.1 MP+20%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
35mm Full-Frame Partially Stacked CMOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
35.6 x 23.8 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix S1 II
Lumix ZS200
AF system
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
77915.9× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Lumix S1 II
Lumix ZS200
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
70 fps2.3× more
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
200 frames14.3× more
14 frames
Lumix S1 II
Lumix ZS200
Max resolution
6K Open Gate
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
1900 Mbps19× more
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
V-Log / ARRI LogC3
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Lumix S1 II
Lumix ZS200
Weight
800 g
340 g−460 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
134.3 × 102.3 × 91.8 mm
111.2 × 66.4 × 45.2 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Lumix S1 II or Lumix ZS200?

Lumix S1 II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix ZS200 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix S1 II and Lumix ZS200?

Lumix S1 II is 24.1 MP and Lumix ZS200 is 20.1 MP, so the Lumix S1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix S1 II and Lumix ZS200 have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix S1 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix ZS200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix S1 II or the Lumix ZS200?

Lumix S1 II reaches 70 fps electronic. Lumix ZS200 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix S1 II and Lumix ZS200?

Lumix S1 II weighs 800 g and Lumix ZS200 weighs 340 g, so the Lumix ZS200 is 460 g lighter.

Do the Lumix S1 II and Lumix ZS200 record 4K video?

Lumix S1 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix ZS200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Lumix S1 II and Lumix ZS200 weather sealed?

Lumix S1 II: Yes. Lumix ZS200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix S1 II and 370 shots for the Lumix ZS200, giving the Lumix ZS200 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix S1 II launched at $3,199 and Lumix ZS200 at $799. The Lumix ZS200 is $2,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.