Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

Lumix ZS200

Pocket travel zoom with 1-inch sensor and 15x Leica lens for vacations.

$799

Launch price

Released Feb 2018

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 7.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

Lumix ZS200

Wins

13categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix ZS200 wins 0 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 49)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher RAW buffer depth (95 frames vs 14 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix ZS200Alpha 7 V
Resolution20.1 MP33 MP
Sensor13.2 x 8.8 mmFull Frame
ISO max12,80051,200
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBISNo7.5-stop
Weight340 g695 g
Battery370 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix ZS200

111 × 66 × 45 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

Lumix ZS200 is 19mm narrower, 30mm shorter, and 37mm thinner than Alpha 7 V.

Lumix ZS200 is 355 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 45mm Lumix ZS200 · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Lumix ZS200

111 × 66 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Lumix ZS200

111 × 45 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix ZS200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Lumix ZS200: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix ZS200Alpha 7 V
Portrait
3.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
4.0Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS200

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.2, 66.4, 45.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Weight

    340 g vs 695 g — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    95 frames vs 14 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 12,800 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 10 fps
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix ZS200

Pros

  • True pocket size
  • 1-inch sensor
  • 24–360mm zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor vs FF
  • No viewfinder grip
  • Older model

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix ZS200 and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix ZS200
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
20.1 MP
33 MP+64%
Sensor type
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
13.2 x 8.8 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Lumix ZS200
Alpha 7 V
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
Lumix ZS200
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
125
100−25 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
51,200+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
204,800
Lumix ZS200
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec
Lumix ZS200
Alpha 7 V
AF system
Contrast AF with DFD technology
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
49
75915.5× more
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Lumix ZS200 or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 7.5/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix ZS200 — 33MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix ZS200 and Alpha 7 V?

Lumix ZS200 is 20.1 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix ZS200 and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix ZS200 does not have IBIS, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix ZS200 or the Alpha 7 V?

Lumix ZS200 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix ZS200 and Alpha 7 V?

Lumix ZS200 weighs 340 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the Lumix ZS200 is 355 g lighter.

Do the Lumix ZS200 and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

Lumix ZS200: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the Lumix ZS200 and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

Lumix ZS200: No. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 370 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix ZS200 and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix ZS200 launched at $799 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The Lumix ZS200 is $2,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Sony press materials.