Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix GH7

Micro Four Thirds video flagship with ProRes RAW and open gate.

$2,199

Released Jun 2024

vs

Panasonic

Lumix ZS200

Pocket travel zoom with 1-inch sensor and 15x Leica lens for vacations.

$799

Released Feb 2018

Lumix GH7 is 6.3 years newer.

Wins

15categories

Lumix GH7

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

1categories

Lumix ZS200

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix GH7 wins 5 categories·Lumix ZS200 wins 0 categories
  • ALumix GH7 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • ALumix GH7 has higher Max video bit rate (1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • ALumix GH7 has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • ALumix GH7 has higher RAW buffer depth (170 frames vs 14 frames)
  • ALumix GH7 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix GH7Lumix ZS200
Resolution25.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorMFT13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max25,60012,800
Burst75 fps30 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight805 g340 g
Battery380 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix GH7

138 × 100 × 100 mm

805 g (1.77 lb / 28.40 oz)

Lumix ZS200

111 × 66 × 45 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

Lumix GH7 is 27mm wider, 34mm taller, and 54mm thicker than Lumix ZS200.

Lumix GH7 is 465 g heavier than Lumix ZS200.

Depth (front-to-back): 100mm Lumix GH7 · 45mm Lumix ZS200

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix GH7

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lumix ZS200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Lumix GH7

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Lumix ZS200: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix GH7Lumix ZS200
Portrait
5.0Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix GH7

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 100.3, 99.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    1900 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    170 frames vs 14 frames — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS200

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.2, 66.4, 45.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Weight

    340 g vs 805 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix GH7

Pros

  • Pro video toolset
  • Open gate
  • Compact MFT
  • Strong codecs

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Still resolution limits
  • Premium for MFT

Lumix ZS200

Pros

  • True pocket size
  • 1-inch sensor
  • 24–360mm zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor vs FF
  • No viewfinder grip
  • Older model

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix GH7
Lumix ZS200
Resolution
25.2 MP+25%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
17.3 x 13.0 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix GH7
Lumix ZS200
AF system
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
77915.9× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Lumix GH7
Lumix ZS200
Burst (mechanical)
14 fps+40%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
75 fps2.5× more
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
170 frames12.1× more
14 frames
Lumix GH7
Lumix ZS200
Max resolution
5.8K Open Gate
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
1900 Mbps19× more
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
V-Log / HLG
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
Lumix GH7
Lumix ZS200
Weight
805 g
340 g−465 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 100.3 × 99.6 mm
111.2 × 66.4 × 45.2 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Lumix GH7 or Lumix ZS200?

Lumix GH7 scores 9.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for Lumix ZS200 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix GH7 and Lumix ZS200?

Lumix GH7 is 25.2 MP and Lumix ZS200 is 20.1 MP, so the Lumix GH7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix GH7 and Lumix ZS200 have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix GH7 has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix ZS200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix GH7 or the Lumix ZS200?

Lumix GH7 reaches 75 fps electronic. Lumix ZS200 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix GH7 and Lumix ZS200?

Lumix GH7 weighs 805 g and Lumix ZS200 weighs 340 g, so the Lumix ZS200 is 465 g lighter.

Do the Lumix GH7 and Lumix ZS200 record 4K video?

Lumix GH7: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix ZS200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Lumix GH7 and Lumix ZS200 weather sealed?

Lumix GH7: Yes. Lumix ZS200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 380 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix GH7 and 370 shots for the Lumix ZS200, giving the Lumix GH7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix GH7 launched at $2,199 and Lumix ZS200 at $799. The Lumix ZS200 is $1,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.